fvcktheworld
Regular Member
- Jun 26, 2010
- 463
- 478
Which one do you guys think is more accurate for estimated search volume?
Google Kewyord tool or MS? for keyword research
- Thread starter fvcktheworld
- Start date
I would personally say Google, Reason being because they are the god of the internet if you so put it. There the main search engine and they are going to have accurate results for what people are searching for , what keywords they are using etc, So they will be more reliable in my eyes for a keyword tool.
xpressioniz
Junior Member
- Jun 4, 2008
- 121
- 17
I would recommend using MS because you can see a quick glance how hard the keyword competition is. With GWT, you have to check manually one by one.
cyberzilla
Elite Member
- Nov 15, 2009
- 2,467
- 3,599
None of them are accurate including Google!
Tools like MS & MNF fetch data from Google. So I use all tools like Google keyword tool(both older and new interface), MS & MNF for selecting my keyword
Tools like MS & MNF fetch data from Google. So I use all tools like Google keyword tool(both older and new interface), MS & MNF for selecting my keyword
chockomonkey
Regular Member
- Mar 27, 2009
- 366
- 41
Yea don't use just one, use many to make sure you get as many keywords as you can find... although MS doesn't really seem to like lists with 1200+ keywords in them.
beazt
Power Member
- Oct 29, 2009
- 768
- 1,259
Google Keyword tool is the best option. I would even say that it is better than Wordtracker. And I wonder why wordtracker is regarded as the most accurate tool, since all it does is extrapolate the search volume numbers taken from some meta-crawlers.
Google keyword tool on the other hand has the most exhaustive database in the world. And best of all, its free! Take the exact match keyword from Google keyword tool and you are closest to accurate search volume.
Google keyword tool on the other hand has the most exhaustive database in the world. And best of all, its free! Take the exact match keyword from Google keyword tool and you are closest to accurate search volume.
fvcktheworld
Regular Member
- Jun 26, 2010
- 463
- 478
Thanks for all of the replies. I do use both, and when I seen this one keyword had way different search results in google then ms, it just got me thinking.
I think ms is more accurate to be totally honest. I know big g is top, but have you ever got an exact search ammount that did not end in zero? Just gets me thinking.
I think ms is more accurate to be totally honest. I know big g is top, but have you ever got an exact search ammount that did not end in zero? Just gets me thinking.