Google has no problem with the growth of AI text and video sites

GoogSEO

GoogSEO

Regular Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2023
Messages
268
Reaction score
163
Here are two sites where I've enabled the AI text stuffing.
The sites are young, one is a year old, the other is 18 months old.
At first I filled both sites through the service, where once every 3-5 days copywriters wrote texts by hand and automatically sent them to the sites.
Then I turned on the trained AI model and began to automatically post 20 to 60 texts per day on each. Immediately on both graphs you can see the increase.
After I enabled the AI service that created the image and video gallery on both of them - immediately both sites show a jump up as well.


Site 1: Restaurants, food services, food delivery in NYC.
site01_small.png

Site 2: Sports nutrition, small sporting goods, methods and courses for sports (USA).
site02_amll.png

Google doesn't have a problem with AI texts. There is a problem only with the purpose of the site's existence and a problem with the quality of the AI-generated texts.
 
Advertise on BHW
At the same time, I am absolutely sure that these sites have no place in the Google rankings. I'm ready for Google to remove them at any moment, and I'll immediately re-launch them in a slightly different form
 
Tell us how do you improve the quality of the AI generated text? I'm sure this is not just a single prompt article, right?

I'm somehow struggling with getting these kind of results, yet I think my content is good enough - users can find the answer their looking for..
 
pollaris75 said:
Tell us how do you improve the quality of the AI generated text? I'm sure this is not just a single prompt article, right?

I'm somehow struggling with getting these kind of results, yet I think my content is good enough - users can find the answer their looking for..
Click to expand...
I don't do anything, the model immediately gives the finished articles and automatically places them on the sites.
 
Yes, looks even after these updates this is still very much possible.

That's why most severe cases were punished manually.

Algorithm is still not able to do it.
 
Google has a problem with small sites, lol.

20-60 articles a day... think about it.

Two years ago i was ranking with pure unreadable spam posting 15-30 articles a day and i thought that was the shit (still works by the way).

I guess AI spam is the new standard :)
 
Matheus Moreira said:
Google has a problem with small sites, lol.

20-60 articles a day... think about it.

Two years ago i was ranking with pure unreadable spam posting 15-30 articles a day and i thought that was the shit (still works by the way).

I guess AI spam is the new standard :)
Click to expand...
A small site by definition can't have a lot of traffic. The number of words on it is limited.
The more words on the site, the higher the traffic.
 
How do you Index 20-60 articles per day? How many images do you add to each article?
 
Matheus Moreira said:
Google has a problem with small sites, lol.

20-60 articles a day... think about it.

Two years ago i was ranking with pure unreadable spam posting 15-30 articles a day and i thought that was the shit (still works by the way).

I guess AI spam is the new standard :)
Click to expand...
This is the case. People think, they can write 10k words about some small niche and keep the quality, the meaning core
What you can write more about for example some chinese toy you are selling?

GoogSEO said:
The more words on the site, the higher the traffic.
Click to expand...
No. This wrong approach on BHW for years.
If you do for example website about Google Pixel smartphones, writing 30 articles / day is stupid.
Google know it, they are not dumb. They know the average words counter on similar websites and if you are much bigger, you are not a better competitor. You are spammer.

This is annoying in the internet. People writing small books about some small things/niches because they belive Google want it
 
1000 domains and training AI with reviewed articles is the key.

Forget results with typical AI $3 spam.

Put 9-5 money into it if you don't have much. Ask parents if you can live with them or someone trusted.

First you can start rolling with expired / auction domains and have a network of 50. But later you need to scale up to 1000 domains.

Otherwise, you'll have to quit. Training can be done in many ways, but one of them is using cheap Amazon accounts and Sagemaker service.
 
Lukmat said:
No. This wrong approach on BHW for years.
If you do for example website about Google Pixel smartphones, writing 30 articles / day is stupid.
Google know it, they are not dumb. They know the average words counter on similar websites and if you are much bigger, you are not a better competitor. You are spammer.
Click to expand...
I will make a site not about Google Pixel smartphones, but I will make a site about all smartphones in the world, and Google Pixel will be allocated for example 20 articles.
How do you think the Google Pixel only site will beat me in traffic?
 
v_kumar36 said:
How do you Index 20-60 articles per day? How many images do you add to each article?
Click to expand...
There is no secret formula for how many images to add, images are added based on the plan of the article where they are appropriate. And to index 100 articles is no problem at all. you send a mobile bot to them and they are in the index in 10 minutes.
 
reaaski said:
1000 domains and training AI with reviewed articles is the key.

Forget results with typical AI $3 spam.

Put 9-5 money into it if you don't have much. Ask parents if you can live with them or someone trusted.

First you can start rolling with expired / auction domains and have a network of 50. But later you need to scale up to 1000 domains.

Otherwise, you'll have to quit. Training can be done in many ways, but one of them is using cheap Amazon accounts and Sagemaker service.
Click to expand...
The technique of simple spam is long gone, only some niches and in limited countries still allow you to get traffic there, but since the end of 2022 this method has fallen into disrepair, and now almost completely stopped working. Now in spam works only overflow weight from parasites through certain types of sites.
 
GoogSEO said:
Here are two sites where I've enabled the AI text stuffing.
The sites are young, one is a year old, the other is 18 months old.
At first I filled both sites through the service, where once every 3-5 days copywriters wrote texts by hand and automatically sent them to the sites.
Then I turned on the trained AI model and began to automatically post 20 to 60 texts per day on each. Immediately on both graphs you can see the increase.
After I enabled the AI service that created the image and video gallery on both of them - immediately both sites show a jump up as well.


Site 1: Restaurants, food services, food delivery in NYC.
View attachment 336350

Site 2: Sports nutrition, small sporting goods, methods and courses for sports (USA).
View attachment 336352

Google doesn't have a problem with AI texts. There is a problem only with the purpose of the site's existence and a problem with the quality of the AI-generated texts.
Click to expand...
Thank you for sharing. I would like to ask, besides these articles, have you conducted any link building activities?
 
GoogSEO said:
The technique of simple spam is long gone, only some niches and in limited countries still allow you to get traffic there, but since the end of 2022 this method has fallen into disrepair, and now almost completely stopped working. Now in spam works only overflow weight from parasites through certain types of sites.
Click to expand...
Spam? High quality spam? Is Hubspot or are other business or authority websites with huge amount of text spammy?

This is not spammy. If you have a network of such sites, you're the boss.

And this is the only approach to gains these days.

I'm not talking about ranking under local search terms for a moment. I care about what is needed today like EEAT, entities etc...

"Site 2: Sports nutrition, small sporting goods, methods and courses for sports (USA)."
Click to expand...

This sounds more interesting though.
 
Last edited:
Yeah we're using nearly 100% AI articles for our clients and we've been seeing growth since the update. One of my clients went from 1000 sessions to 2500, we're grabbing featured snippets, getting maps rankings and organic rankings, everything. Hell we just got a 25 spot bump for a medspa this past week AI still works, mass page sites still work, you just need to know how to do it.
 
GoogSEO said:
I will make a site not about Google Pixel smartphones, but I will make a site about all smartphones in the world, and Google Pixel will be allocated for example 20 articles.
How do you think the Google Pixel only site will beat me in traffic?
Click to expand...
Well, if you want to compete with some giant websites building for years - it's impossible, unless you have 20 years like them ;)
 
Hello, i would like to generate some batch ai content , do you have any guide or where i can learn ?

i just start a website and most of my competitors have Ai content and i'm trying to find a solution but chatgpt can get me same quality like them !
 
Advertise on BHW
You must log in or register to reply here.
Sign up now!

Main Menu

Home Main Forum List Black Hat SEO White Hat SEO BHW Newbie Guide Blogging Black Hat Tools Social Networking Downloads

Marketplace

Content / Copywriting Hosting Images, Logos & Videos Proxies For Sale SEO - Link building SEO - Packages Social Media Social Media - Panels Web Design Misc

Making Money

Affiliate Programs Hire a Freelancer Making Money Pay Per Click Site Flipping

BlackHatWorld

BHW Merch Forum Suggestions & Feedback Introductions Lounge Dispute Resolution

Other

Domain Name Forum IM Journeys Web Hosting Newsletter
Back
Top