1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Getting Rid of 1million Scrapebox Limit!

Discussion in 'Black Hat SEO Tools' started by Sugirl, Jan 18, 2011.

  1. Sugirl

    Sugirl Regular Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2010
    Messages:
    464
    Likes Received:
    283
    Is there a way to get rid of the 1million link/keyword limit in the scrapebox?
    I see it's ok for slow Pc's but mine can handle at least 10X that without problem and it's creating a huge limit on what I could do with SB.

    thanks!
     
  2. Nuz25

    Nuz25 Junior Member

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2010
    Messages:
    129
    Likes Received:
    100
    Occupation:
    I'm a student
    I feel your pain, but I think the only way to do that is to play with the source code
     
  3. JenniFranks

    JenniFranks Junior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2010
    Messages:
    124
    Likes Received:
    44
    Occupation:
    UI Design
    Location:
    Chicago
    The best solution is to just run multiple instances of ScrapeBox.
     
  4. Merlin22

    Merlin22 Regular Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2010
    Messages:
    215
    Likes Received:
    32
    It sounds like you have an awesome computer. What kind of setup do you have if you don't mind me asking?
     
  5. m_zec

    m_zec Jr. VIP Jr. VIP Premium Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2010
    Messages:
    331
    Likes Received:
    440
    The 1 million limitation is actually windows imposed, not Scrapebox. Changing it would require rewriting scrapebox. Not possible at this point.
     
  6. Monrox

    Monrox Power Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2010
    Messages:
    615
    Likes Received:
    579
    Not true. 32 bit Windows can handle lists up to around 4 billion entries. 64 bit a lot more than that. It may be a limitation by the used programming öanguage or a developer's idea.

    At any rate you are indeed better off with multiple instances as tracking a single 500 000 list is at least 10 times slower (and somewhat more unstable) than working with 2 lists with 250 000 entries each. Unless of course you have some super duper multi cpu xeon system.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1