Thread Approved
Summary
Fro the review, I asked
@Real Ranker to write an article on the topic of technical SEO. More specifically, "what it is and why you need to do it". Two days later, I received the article and performed my usual checks. While the article passed
Service Highlights
- The content was written decently enough with a somewhat casual tone and it definitely didn't sound like spun content.
- No errors according to Grammarly.
- 0% plagiarism according to the checker I used.
- The article was researched, but only just enough to cover the basics. Still, this is absolutely fine.
What Needs Improvement
- Whilst Gramarly did not pick up on any errors, I did spot a few myself.
- The main topic of the article was only touched upon at the beginning. I was expecting the article to answer the question of "why" more than "how".
Additional Information
- We all know there are nuances in the English language. There was one line in the article that said "... if you are non-technical, a good idea is to seek professional help". Grammatically, there's nothing wrong here, but some people could, hilariously enough, misinterpret that sentence as "you need to seek professional mental health for your computer illiteracy. It's silly, I know, and I didn't expect the seller to know this, which is why I'm listing this under "additional information" rather than "what needs improvement.". But again, overall the article was just fine.