expired domains for web 2.0?
- Thread starter wizeman
- Start date
Trained Wolf
Supreme Member
- Oct 30, 2014
- 1,453
- 274
Yes, Expired web 2.0 sites still helps
ContentWriter
Banned - Selling via PM
- May 8, 2013
- 5,735
- 975
- Aug 4, 2015
- 4,559
- 679
Yeah, still Web 2.0 performing well
CookServers
Junior Member
- Mar 15, 2017
- 196
- 16
Normally I would screen through the expired web2.0 properties, before picking them up and reusing them. I'd generally mark these proxies based on TF>20, DA/PA>30, must not have spam links, check against Moz for its spam score and proceed from there, and if the expired web2.0 has .EDU or .GOV links or high PR links from news sites, CNN, Techcrunch, Wikipedia, etc, I'd definitely put them in my to-watch list.
Thanks for the replies. I am wondering now:
Is it better to buy expired domain write related content and link to your web 2.0 (which then links to target site), or just link directly to your website from expired domain?
Or just buy expired web 2.0?
Can someone explain the difference (noob i know)? Or what is basic process for using expired domain for web 2.0?
Is it better to buy expired domain write related content and link to your web 2.0 (which then links to target site), or just link directly to your website from expired domain?
Or just buy expired web 2.0?
Can someone explain the difference (noob i know)? Or what is basic process for using expired domain for web 2.0?
- May 10, 2012
- 9,541
- 7,560
If you build your PBN site, then it's a waste of resources IMO to use it as a tier 2 and point it to a web 2.0 buffer. Both expired web 2.0s and expired domains should be pointed to a money site. Of course, there are some other techniques, but for the time being, let's just focus on the basics.
Difference between the web 2.0s and domains is day and night. If your keyword is at least somewhat competitive, you won't rank top 3 with web 2.0s alone. You also aren't in control of your web 2.0 properties and they can be deleted at any time. They are however safer than PBN links. Another advantage is, that they are cheap.
PBN domains are significantly stronger, there is a risk involved with them of course if you don't build them right (and even if you do to some extent). They are more expensive, considering the cost of content, hosting, registration etc, but you own them and they won't get deleted just for lulz.
If you are planning to rank some medium competition keywords, then it will be very very hard to rank them without PBN links or without guest posts or other strong and more expensive links.
Difference between the web 2.0s and domains is day and night. If your keyword is at least somewhat competitive, you won't rank top 3 with web 2.0s alone. You also aren't in control of your web 2.0 properties and they can be deleted at any time. They are however safer than PBN links. Another advantage is, that they are cheap.
PBN domains are significantly stronger, there is a risk involved with them of course if you don't build them right (and even if you do to some extent). They are more expensive, considering the cost of content, hosting, registration etc, but you own them and they won't get deleted just for lulz.
If you are planning to rank some medium competition keywords, then it will be very very hard to rank them without PBN links or without guest posts or other strong and more expensive links.