1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Does ******** Twitter Bot v4 Work?

Discussion in 'Black Hat SEO' started by talwin, Nov 4, 2011.

  1. talwin

    talwin Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2010
    Messages:
    62
    Likes Received:
    71
    I found Twitter Bot v4 on youtube. The guy shows a lot of traffic coming in within minutes using only 3 new twitter accounts with no followers. I'm having a hard time figuring out where the traffic is coming from. He say's it's coming from Twitter, but I didn't know you can get that much traffic with no followers and without following anyone. I'm weary of buying it until I get some opinions. I think I remember this being mentioned before on BHW, but my searches are coming up empty. Here's the youtube video:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KEPOudG15lM
     
  2. faithjhung

    faithjhung Jr. VIP Jr. VIP Premium Member

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2009
    Messages:
    1,444
    Likes Received:
    911
    Location:
    New York
    The clicks are mostly from bots not real human. only about 1% of the clicks are from real people.
    i'd recommend you to invest on tweet attacks rather than this.
     
  3. stumblebum

    stumblebum Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2009
    Messages:
    86
    Likes Received:
    16
    I was going to open a thread to ask members what was better.

    Tweet attacks pro

    or

    ********s twitter bot.

    I have seen the video many times, and was very undecided . It does get a lot of traffic from twtitter but I wondered how that traffic would convert. Weather it was real people or bots.

    At $1000 for twitter bot I think I am more declined to go with tweet attcks pro.

    Although if most of the traffic from twitter bots v4 is bots then surely most of the traffic for tweet attacks is bots too? Or am I missing something here...
     
  4. talwin

    talwin Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2010
    Messages:
    62
    Likes Received:
    71
    Thanks. I think I'll just skip it then. :)