1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Do you name your Web 2.0 blogs and sites after their authority sites?

Discussion in 'Link Building' started by Gormagor, Feb 4, 2012.

  1. Gormagor

    Gormagor Junior Member Premium Member

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2011
    Messages:
    199
    Likes Received:
    137
    Hey everyone,

    I've spent some time recently creating new Web 2.0 blogs and sites so that I can post spun articles on them with backlinks to the money site containing the original article. Each blog or site is named after the original website. So if, for example, the original website is bhwisawesome(dot)com, the blogs are all something like bhwisawesome(dot)blogspot(dot)com or bhwisawesome(dot)weebly(dot)com, etc. We're talking about 50 different Web 2.0s with the same name as the money site.

    I was just doing all this in autopilot and it didn't really occur to me to step back and think that this might not be such a good idea. After all, at the end of the day, I'm creating sites that are nothing more than parallel sites to the original (I repeat: They contain the same articles as the original site, albeit well-spun and Copyscape-passed versions). Surely this constitutes a blindingly obvious backlinking footprint, should Adsense ever investigate? (Blogger automatically added my blogs to my Analytics account without my consent, so they already know about them :rolleyes:).

    So the questions I pose are thus: Should I rename these 2.0 sites to something different? Do you name yours after your original site? Or am I being paranoid? :D
     
  2. arpitagarwal82

    arpitagarwal82 Power Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2008
    Messages:
    709
    Likes Received:
    456
    Location:
    Localhost
    IMO don't do that. Keep the content, URL and title of your web 2.0 properties loosely related to your money site's niche.
    Two reasons for that:
    1) It helps to avoid footprints.
    2) By creating a web 2.0 property optimized for your authority niche creates a useless competition for your money site.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  3. saber210

    saber210 Supreme Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2011
    Messages:
    1,358
    Likes Received:
    500
    Location:
    -
    So its not good to name your web 2.0 like your name?
     
  4. arpitagarwal82

    arpitagarwal82 Power Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2008
    Messages:
    709
    Likes Received:
    456
    Location:
    Localhost
    Just my opinion and experience.
     
  5. seolabs82

    seolabs82 Regular Member Premium Member

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2011
    Messages:
    214
    Likes Received:
    34
    you're being paranoid & i was a few months back at start.
    don't think too much, just grasp & go with the basics. its not needed.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  6. Gormagor

    Gormagor Junior Member Premium Member

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2011
    Messages:
    199
    Likes Received:
    137
    Thanks, this has confirmed my suspicions.

    What do other people think?