1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

CPA Section 50 Posts + 30 days?

Discussion in 'CPA' started by Gogeta, Jun 9, 2009.

?

CPA Section 50 Posts + 30 Days on The forum?

  1. Yes

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  2. No

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  3. Other

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  1. Gogeta

    Gogeta Power Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2008
    Messages:
    524
    Likes Received:
    1,493
    Occupation:
    Internet Hustler
    A few weeks back a few people lost their CPA accounts after the networks used a hidden image to log IP address's. Today I lost one of my accounts because they said I was a member of a blackhat forum. :rolleyes:

    Luckily I only had a small amount of money in that account. I think we should add the same restriction to the CPA section that is in the CS section. 50 quality posts + 30 days on the forum.

    Although it will not keep some aff managers out it will add some protection to the forum and may even keep methods becoming saturated by lurkers.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 2
  2. goins

    goins Regular Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2007
    Messages:
    234
    Likes Received:
    62
    this is a great idea. i hope this goes through
     
  3. seikooc

    seikooc Regular Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2008
    Messages:
    268
    Likes Received:
    132
    Occupation:
    BH Implementation
    Location:
    Blackhat World
    I agree and all guys here should try not to use the same IP to login BHW and their Aff sites. Just trying to be safe...
     
  4. Realign02

    Realign02 Regular Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2007
    Messages:
    387
    Likes Received:
    232
    Occupation:
    Full time IMER
    I voted Yes. I still don't understand what the big deal is that we are members of this forum. Most really good blackhatters can whitehat their ass of so to speak.

    As long as the leads are converting why do they care where they're coming from?
     
    Last edited: Jun 9, 2009
  5. Gogeta

    Gogeta Power Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2008
    Messages:
    524
    Likes Received:
    1,493
    Occupation:
    Internet Hustler
    Agreed I was actually sending them converting traffic. But they still banned me.
     
  6. Nickehyz

    Nickehyz Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2009
    Messages:
    81
    Likes Received:
    4
    Location:
    USA
    I don't even have 50 posts, but I totally agree.
     
  7. Mondlicht

    Mondlicht Junior Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2009
    Messages:
    166
    Likes Received:
    63
    Location:
    UK or GER
    because they are getting lots of complains when they were not able to read the terms and conditions and suddenly got a bill on their card.
     
  8. seikooc

    seikooc Regular Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2008
    Messages:
    268
    Likes Received:
    132
    Occupation:
    BH Implementation
    Location:
    Blackhat World
    No doubt!! Most of the AM's don't really care unless you are out to commit fraud. And if you do that with all the info we have to make money with IM then you are an idiot and you don't belong in this biz!!
     
  9. reqd

    reqd Junior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2008
    Messages:
    112
    Likes Received:
    245
    Occupation:
    The Milkman
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    Home Page:
    Wow... how the hell did he find out it was you? Unless he recognized your voice from that last video you published...ha~! (Great vid BTW)
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  10. turnhardtoeasy

    turnhardtoeasy Junior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2009
    Messages:
    132
    Likes Received:
    86
    Occupation:
    Maintaining Privacy
    Location:
    IN YOUR DREAMS
    Home Page:
    Oh... i dont have enough posts but i would still vote yes as this would help us all overcome the problem atleast till some extent.
    on second thoughts... dont they just ban you for being a member of BHW forum...!
    then how would limiting the CPA section help!!!
    will vote - neg
    + dont you think that people like me who are new to the forum will be motivated to post shitty posts just to count up their Posts... i think its a bad idea
     
  11. megaw

    megaw Newbie

    Joined:
    May 28, 2009
    Messages:
    47
    Likes Received:
    4
    I voted yes. I'm far more candid on forums that are private than I ever would be here.
     
  12. Ilike2make$

    Ilike2make$ Newbie

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2009
    Messages:
    42
    Likes Received:
    6
    I would vote no on this one for the simple reason that some people like myself do not just post to get our numbers up. I am slowly learning and reading and offering up info when i have it.... I refuse to post stupid bullshit or one liners just to get my post count up. Putting a limit on this section would not stop a AM....that person would just go around and throw out bullshit one liners and eventually get to 50 posts...then what? Would we raise it to 100 posts?
     
  13. mr4army

    mr4army Regular Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2008
    Messages:
    459
    Likes Received:
    80
    Home Page:
    i agree 100 posts should keep them out for a while
     
    Last edited: Jun 9, 2009
  14. springer98

    springer98 Regular Member

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2008
    Messages:
    211
    Likes Received:
    250
    Occupation:
    We doeneeeeed no stinkin' yob!
    Location:
    ZRF
    50 posts and 30 days wouldn't keep the AMs out any more than public voting keeps crooks out of politics. In fact, I can't think of a single thing that would keep anyone out of here, short of the owner and admins only inviting their closest, personal friends. Even that wouldn't keep out anyone who REALLY wanted to see behind the curtain.

    Face the facts; as long as BHW exists there will be lurkers and snitches here who're just looking for someone to rat out. The only way to avoid getting caught in their snare is to exercise your own personal level of safety and watch what you say.
     
  15. g-Vector

    g-Vector Regular Member

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2009
    Messages:
    241
    Likes Received:
    117
    Location:
    .nl
    I have to agree that postcount alone, is not going to stop any CPA-network AM.
    As an example, look at this thread over at DP.
    The user name is p3pp3rjam, and has hundreds of posts.
    Code:
    forums.digitalpoint.com/showthread.php?t=691231
    Let's say that the mods over at DP verified the registration. But it were probably more people than Kr1s J0nes of p3pp3rjam who made those posts.
    Taking turns with that user name. I just made 5 posts Kr1s, tag, you're it!.
    They'll probably make the minimum post count in less than an hour.

    While this thread and its suggestions are a good initiative, the same suggestions would put an end to my self-study.

    Robert
     
  16. TermsB

    TermsB Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2009
    Messages:
    1,076
    Likes Received:
    734
    Location:
    USA
    Big NO. All this would do is make people "spam" more to get their count up. While the AM's would and probably already do have aged and high post accounts here.
     
  17. turnhardtoeasy

    turnhardtoeasy Junior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2009
    Messages:
    132
    Likes Received:
    86
    Occupation:
    Maintaining Privacy
    Location:
    IN YOUR DREAMS
    Home Page:
    moreover the managers would easily pay 100$ premium membership for a year and get easy access anyhow to the site. now thaz a good deal for them but a fucked up situation for us...
     
  18. zongoneri

    zongoneri Junior Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2008
    Messages:
    107
    Likes Received:
    42
    why not post a new rule on BHW, any AM or company who is on forum without inform admins need to pay $1000 per day/access?

    On this base company's will run on a legal agreement and risk pay or jail.

    The rule can also be extended to "someone delegated to do something on behalf of company"
     
  19. aмillionaírе

    aмillionaírе Jr. VIP Jr. VIP Premium Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2008
    Messages:
    532
    Likes Received:
    358
    Why were you complaining about him when he's been good to you? :hmmmm2:

    They'd probably laugh at anyone who asks of that. You do realize this is the internet right? It would have the same level of humor as threatening, illiterate, and upset CL victims of marketing.
     
    Last edited: Jun 9, 2009
  20. Kydos123

    Kydos123 Newbie

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2009
    Messages:
    1
    Likes Received:
    3
    Care to say what network banned you for being a member of BHW?

    By the way, voted yes. Although I'm new in here as a member, I think it's a good idea. Plus it gives you an incentive to stay longer and collaborate with the community
     
    Last edited: Jun 9, 2009