Clarification on Web 2.0 Properties

Vibrance

Junior Member
Joined
Jul 6, 2011
Messages
132
Reaction score
2,191
Hi All,

Before I create a bunch of Web 2.0 properties, I just have a few questions I want to ask to make sure I am doing it the correct way.

Consider I have just made a Micro Niche Site in relation to the following questions:

1) How many Web 2.0's should i initially create, and at what rate should I create more in the future?

2) Should I be writing completely unique content that is related to (but not exactly the same topic) as my money site? Or, should it be spun content from articles on my money site? Also, if it is to be completely unique (and not spun), should there be completely unique articles for each Web 2.0 For example, if I created 5 Web 2.0's, should they all have unique hand created articles?

3) Should there be more than 1 article per Web 2.0?

An example Web 2.0 page would be great, just to have a look at one in action


Thanks very much
 
I am also interested in hearing other peoples responses to this. I believe that one article on a web 2.0 is enough. I dont think the content has to be too different from the money site as that should outrank all ur web 2.0 sites pretty easily. I would suggest getting links to ur web 2.0s as well to increase their linking juice
 
Hi All,

Before I create a bunch of Web 2.0 properties, I just have a few questions I want to ask to make sure I am doing it the correct way.

Consider I have just made a Micro Niche Site in relation to the following questions:

1) How many Web 2.0's should i initially create, and at what rate should I create more in the future?

2) Should I be writing completely unique content that is related to (but not exactly the same topic) as my money site? Or, should it be spun content from articles on my money site? Also, if it is to be completely unique (and not spun), should there be completely unique articles for each Web 2.0 For example, if I created 5 Web 2.0's, should they all have unique hand created articles?

3) Should there be more than 1 article per Web 2.0?

An example Web 2.0 page would be great, just to have a look at one in action


Thanks very much

For a new website everyday

1. 20-25 web 2.0 blog posts
2. 100-150 social bookmarking
3. 25-50 High PR forum profile backlinks or angela and paul type backlinks
4. Only Make xrumer or scrapebox backlinks to your tier 1 or tier 2 backlinks.
5. 15-20 High PR blog comment
6. 15-20 high PR Forum Threads.
7. 10-15 article backlinks to your main website and its inner page
8. 40-60 article backlinks to web 2.0 blog posts.
9. Target more than 2 keywords.
10. When your website comes to 1st page for targeted keywords. Reduce link building to half of above mentioned and on other half target other keywords.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Well, I have lots to say on this subject. :P

What I recommend is using unique content - sites like hubpages do not accept duplicate nor spuns. Get only the web 2.0s that are ******** and high in PR. One page web 2.0s are enough, but you can turn them into full authority blogs if you upload several articles. You must build backlinks to these web 2.0s - otherwise there's only a limited sucess (you'll quadruple the results if you do build backlinks). "Google Frontier 2.0" is the best web 2.0 service on the SEO and linkbuilding market. Just google and find out about it.
 
So once I have exhausted the entire list of web 2.0's should I be adding more than 1 article to each property?

You can do that, you can created another account on the same domain or you can boost the accounts you already have. Actually you can do all three.

If you are building a lot of web 2.0 pages to your site you need to backlink them as well. You do not want a lot of links going to your money site that do not have any backlinks going to them. Turn them into pyramids. Take five of them and create 50 blog posts linking to those five, the create 500 articles linking to those 50 pages and then backlink the hell out of those 500 articles with blog comments and anything else you can throw at them.
 
Back
Top