Can Google detect HQ paraphrased content (product descriptions)?

Cryptochick007

Junior Member
Joined
May 9, 2022
Messages
135
Reaction score
51
Hello Blackhat' friends,

I am using a HQ paraphraser api to spin product descriptions. Content is superb. I can not tell that this is automatically rewritten.
Is there a possibility to get a google penalty over time?

Thanks in advance for your help!
 
Hello Blackhat' friends,

I am using a HQ paraphraser api to spin product descriptions. Content is superb. I can not tell that this is automatically rewritten.
Is there a possibility to get a google penalty over time?

Thanks in advance for your help!
Not unless your content is plagiarized.
If it's unique it will index and can also rank if optimized.
 
Not unless your content is plagiarized.
If it's unique it will index and can also rank if optimized.
Thanks for helping me out! Appreciate it!
Do you maybe know of a way to optimize large databases with product descriptions? I have around 12.000 products so optimizing them by hand will take ages :confused::p.
 
Thanks for helping me out! Appreciate it!
Do you maybe know of a way to optimize large databases with product descriptions? I have around 12.000 products so optimizing them by hand will take ages :confused::p.
Tools like surferseo and Pageoptimizerpro can help you with that but it's not possible to automate the process.
A decent free option is textoptimizer browser extension, gives out topics and keywords that can be added to improve content.
 
It's all about context, search intent and adding value.

If you just say the very same thing just with different words, it will be harder to rank. There is no added value.

Simply using rewritten product descriptions has been mentioned as not the best practice multiple times.

If there's other content present, that's a different matter.
 
It may work, but you must experiment with it. Personally I like all these kind of tools even, AI purely written content, but the thing is going big on numbers. If you are going to build like 1K pages per day with this kind of content, and then 10 rank, great. If you are willing to post 10 because you don't have the technical skills to go for such bulk amount, then you are basically wasting your time, instead of choosing the high-quality-unique-never-written-before content which has more chances to rank more swiftly.

Paraphrasing, spinning and AI-auto-generated content are not real replacements of unique content. They are only potential Google foolers which work once out of X (undetermined) times.
 
Tools like surferseo and Pageoptimizerpro can help you with that but it's not possible to automate the process.
A decent free option is textoptimizer browser extension, gives out topics and keywords that can be added to improve content.
Do these tools have an API? Or is there maybe a way that a dev can build something to automate that process?
 
Do these tools have an API? Or is there maybe a way that a dev can build something to automate that process?
No if there would have been an api it would have been advertised publicly on their respective websites.
I assume the dev part can be achieved, but optimization requires human intervention so I am not sure it will work that way.
 
It may work, but you must experiment with it. Personally I like all these kind of tools even, AI purely written content, but the thing is going big on numbers. If you are going to build like 1K pages per day with this kind of content, and then 10 rank, great. If you are willing to post 10 because you don't have the technical skills to go for such bulk amount, then you are basically wasting your time, instead of choosing the high-quality-unique-never-written-before content which has more chances to rank more swiftly.

Paraphrasing, spinning and AI-auto-generated content are not real replacements of unique content. They are only potential Google foolers which work once out of X (undetermined) times.


Do you know a perfect approach to detecting paraphrased article that reads so good and hardly detectable? I suspect my writer is submitting paraphrased but could figure a genuine reason to get him sanctionced yet.
 
Do you know a perfect approach to detecting paraphrased article that reads so good and hardly detectable? I suspect my writer is submitting paraphrased but could figure a genuine reason to get him sanctionced yet.
The only ways is by using those antiplagiarism software + reading by yourself

I remember that one of the top paying sites for writers were using copyscape API and accepting most of the content submitted (they also had client feedback from 1 to 5, so basically some clients read the content).

But as long as you pass it through Quetext and Copyscape and it's kind of right (in case you are suspicious), and you read it, and is readable, then you can be somewhat happy to be safe.
 
Back
Top