Best Ai for Blogging

Don't write full content with A.i or chatgpt, i suggest you to only get some idea or structure from the A.I and then you can give your personal touch for better ranking.
 
Advertise on BHW
SERP Stacking said:
Hello Buddies! Anyone knows what's the best ai writer for Blogging? I need an ai which gives output near about 80-100% human. I used google gemini. But most of the time it gives ai content.
Click to expand...
All these tools like gemini are improving with each new version. You also need very good prompts to produce very good results.
 
SERP Stacking said:
Hello Buddies! Anyone knows what's the best ai writer for Blogging? I need an ai which gives output near about 80-100% human. I used google gemini. But most of the time it gives ai content.
Click to expand...
I wish someone would just show me step by step process of how they pick and write blog post
 
Kasun0777 said:
Use AI tools for the corrections. Dont generate paragraphs. ChatGPT free version is good for me :)
Click to expand...
Totally agree, in the end your content must have that human touch. One can use AI for inspiration in terms of case study or getting idea around what is trending and writing around it by involving those ranking words in content, what you think?
 
SERP Stacking said:
Hello Buddies! Anyone knows what's the best ai writer for Blogging? I need an ai which gives output near about 80-100% human. I used google gemini. But most of the time it gives ai content.
Click to expand...

No, no and no.

This is not how you are going to rank blogs in 2024.

Forget this "80-100%" nonsense. Google does not use AI content detectors, nor does it care how you write the content.

AI detectors are a profit grab and highly inaccurate. Parts of the bible and US constitution are apparently 100% AI according to originality.ai.

It would be chaos if Google started

A) Ranking 100% human content higher

B) Deranking 100% AI

Great content would end up being pushed out the serps, and garbage content pushed up.

You can get a high human score if you want, but you'll make your content lower quality in doing so.

Here's what you focus on instead.

ENGAGEMENT.

This is THE metric in 2024.

Google gave up the AI war. They are using users now to judge the quality of content. If users don't engage with your content/site then you drop.

What this means in practical terms for AI content is that your sole focus should be on having the AI create content that the user is looking for. It should answer the questions they want, and answer other questions they didn't know they had, but will be interested in.

I call this "primary user intent" and "secondary user intents".

Your content can be 100% AI, but if it actually delivers what the users want, it will rank.

If you focus on getting a high human score. You are not going to be successful. It's a meaningless metric that won't get you anywhere except feeling good that your content is 100% human.

Here..

Google "how does carbonation work"

#1 - https://quenchwater.com/blog/how-does-carbonation-work/

https://share.zight.com/12ulQbwX - 74% AI

"How to lose weight fast"

https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/322345#protein-with-meals

Section 1 and 2 - 100% original

Section 3 and 4 - 93% AI


https://www.mountsinai.org/health-library/special-topic/diet-for-rapid-weight-loss - Number 4

98% AI - https://share.zight.com/lluW8WRY


Is it AI?

Who knows..

The Internet is full of AI content, and AI detectors will get more and more useless and human and AI content converges in. Training data will become impossible to get.

And a lot of the techniques they use are just not accurate. You can find countless people moaning all over the Internet about how they were fired from their writing job, or failed from university because of AI detectors when they have written 100% themselves. Generally cheats don't go on reddit to complain when they're caught cheating.

I even tested a lot of my own writers content from 2020-2021. Many of it comes up 60-100% AI, and AI couldn't write at a human level back then.

Certain writers will always be flagged as AI. It just depends how you write.
 
AI tools like OpenAI's GPT-4 or Jarvis by Conversion.ai are excellent for blogging tasks.
 
splishsplash said:
No, no and no.

This is not how you are going to rank blogs in 2024.

Forget this "80-100%" nonsense. Google does not use AI content detectors, nor does it care how you write the content.

AI detectors are a profit grab and highly inaccurate. Parts of the bible and US constitution are apparently 100% AI according to originality.ai.

It would be chaos if Google started

A) Ranking 100% human content higher

B) Deranking 100% AI

Great content would end up being pushed out the serps, and garbage content pushed up.

You can get a high human score if you want, but you'll make your content lower quality in doing so.

Here's what you focus on instead.

ENGAGEMENT.

This is THE metric in 2024.

Google gave up the AI war. They are using users now to judge the quality of content. If users don't engage with your content/site then you drop.

What this means in practical terms for AI content is that your sole focus should be on having the AI create content that the user is looking for. It should answer the questions they want, and answer other questions they didn't know they had, but will be interested in.

I call this "primary user intent" and "secondary user intents".

Your content can be 100% AI, but if it actually delivers what the users want, it will rank.

If you focus on getting a high human score. You are not going to be successful. It's a meaningless metric that won't get you anywhere except feeling good that your content is 100% human.

Here..

Google "how does carbonation work"

#1 - https://quenchwater.com/blog/how-does-carbonation-work/

https://share.zight.com/12ulQbwX - 74% AI

"How to lose weight fast"

https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/322345#protein-with-meals

Section 1 and 2 - 100% original

Section 3 and 4 - 93% AI


https://www.mountsinai.org/health-library/special-topic/diet-for-rapid-weight-loss - Number 4

98% AI - https://share.zight.com/lluW8WRY


Is it AI?

Who knows..

The Internet is full of AI content, and AI detectors will get more and more useless and human and AI content converges in. Training data will become impossible to get.

And a lot of the techniques they use are just not accurate. You can find countless people moaning all over the Internet about how they were fired from their writing job, or failed from university because of AI detectors when they have written 100% themselves. Generally cheats don't go on reddit to complain when they're caught cheating.

I even tested a lot of my own writers content from 2020-2021. Many of it comes up 60-100% AI, and AI couldn't write at a human level back then.

Certain writers will always be flagged as AI( ChatGPT 3.5) . It just depends how you write.
Click to expand...
Maybe your AI detector is not correct?
I used this tool: https://writer.com/ai-content-detector/

Article 1 98% HUMAN-GENERATED CONTENT

Article 2 99% HUMAN-GENERATED CONTENT

Article 3 93% HUMAN-GENERATED CONTENT

I also tried the content generated by AI(ChatGPT 3.5), the result is 70%-85% HUMAN-GENERATED CONTENT,

You can test it yourself, thanks.
 

Attachments

  • Snap129.png
    Snap129.png
    122.3 KB · Views: 3
Kevin_Deng said:
Maybe your AI detector is not correct?
I used this tool: https://writer.com/ai-content-detector/

Article 1 98% HUMAN-GENERATED CONTENT

Article 2 99% HUMAN-GENERATED CONTENT

Article 3 93% HUMAN-GENERATED CONTENT

I also tried the content generated by AI(ChatGPT 3.5), the result is 70%-85% HUMAN-GENERATED CONTENT,

You can test it yourself, thanks.
Click to expand...
Every 'ai detector' on the planet is just a random number generator. At least the ones that are currently open to the public.
Try this one with your tool: https://www.vatican.va/archive/bible/genesis/documents/bible_genesis_en.html
 
I suggest you to write it manually and then rephrase it with Chatgot to give it a professional touch. This is how my blogs are ranking without any issues.
 
Kevin_Deng said:
Maybe your AI detector is not correct?
I used this tool: https://writer.com/ai-content-detector/

Article 1 98% HUMAN-GENERATED CONTENT

Article 2 99% HUMAN-GENERATED CONTENT

Article 3 93% HUMAN-GENERATED CONTENT

I also tried the content generated by AI(ChatGPT 3.5), the result is 70%-85% HUMAN-GENERATED CONTENT,

You can test it yourself, thanks.
Click to expand...

You are using an AI content detector created by an AI writing company…….

And you get 70-85% human on basic gpt3.5? :)

Dot dot dot. Connect the dots ;-)
 
SERP Stacking said:
Hello Buddies! Anyone knows what's the best ai writer for Blogging? I need an ai which gives output near about 80-100% human. I used google gemini. But most of the time it gives ai content.
Click to expand...
I would like to suggest you that please use perplexity for the blog writing. It give seo optimized content and 100% human written.
 
Advertise on BHW
You must log in or register to reply here.
Sign up now!

Main Menu

Home Main Forum List Black Hat SEO White Hat SEO BHW Newbie Guide Blogging Black Hat Tools Social Networking Downloads

Marketplace

Content / Copywriting Hosting Images, Logos & Videos Proxies For Sale SEO - Link building SEO - Packages Social Media Social Media - Panels Web Design Misc

Making Money

Affiliate Programs Hire a Freelancer Making Money Pay Per Click Site Flipping

BlackHatWorld

BHW Merch Forum Suggestions & Feedback Introductions Lounge Dispute Resolution

Other

Domain Name Forum IM Journeys Web Hosting Newsletter
Back
Top
AdBlock Detected

We get it, advertisements are annoying!

Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks useful features and essential functions on BlackHatWorld and other forums. These functions are unrelated to ads, such as internal links and images. For the best site experience please disable your AdBlocker.

I've Disabled AdBlock