Are w3 Validations really that important for SEO?

charbel

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2012
Messages
866
Reaction score
329
Hey guys, i never really see any body discussing W3Validations, (coding errors you have within your website)

I'm wondering, my website has 22 Errors, and 15 warnings on the root page (the ranking page)

Will fixing these help the chances of increased rank?
 
I believe you should take the errors and warning with a grain of salt. I have many clients with highly ranked websites, and some of them have errors and some of them don't. I think if your using a theme and it is pumping out thousands of errors, you should evaluate it. But for a low amount such as that I wouldn't sweat it. Now- if those errors are easy to fix, why not just fix them?

Also make sure your using the right W3 Validator.
 
No - I'm still seeing crappy old non-compliant designs ranking. Then again, I've never done an exhaustive split test.
 
Hubba is correct. Unless there are major errors, you'll see no effect
on rankings whatsoever. Additionally, it doesn't help that many of the
validators are themselves broken in their interpretation of the standards.
 
This is just another hook that they want you to bite, so you can lose your time with unimportant things.

So true. I had hundreds and thousands of coding errors on my site (Indian coder lol). I spend a nice sum to get them fixed. It did not help AT ALL in my rankings.
 
One of my websites has way more errors and warnings than the OP'a site, yet it ranks well. Those errors and warnings mean nothing to Google.
 
Definitely not. There are by far more top ranking sites with code errors than sites with no error. Take a look at Newegg for instance, 899 errors and 502 warnings, and still has top rankings.
 
Back
Top