Anyone here use AI writing softwares for money sites?

reaaski

Power Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2013
Messages
637
Reaction score
951
anyone here using articleforge??
a pioneer of AI writter..
They charge you a fixed fee, are slow and basically at their level it's weird they still have limited language support.
Translation to any language with this type of solution should be provided out of the box.
It was good before gpt-3, but now they're behind.
 

SilverKnight

Power Member
Joined
May 31, 2011
Messages
732
Reaction score
94
The most expensive token gets me 5k words for 30 cents.

How good is that 5k word content for 30 cents?

Can you show any article you generated? Without editing.

I have used quite a few tools now. Article Forge, WriterZen, Copymatic, Writesonic, Rytr and a few more I think. Whatever they generate, it always require a lot of proofreading and editing (sometimes more, sometimes less). So, as opposed to all the ads and reviews of these tools that say write a 1000 word article in 2 mins - that doesn't seem true. Cause I spend a lot of time to make the post worthy of posting on the blog.
 

reaaski

Power Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2013
Messages
637
Reaction score
951
How good is that 5k word content for 30 cents?

Can you show any article you generated? Without editing.

I have used quite a few tools now. Article Forge, WriterZen, Copymatic, Writesonic, Rytr and a few more I think. Whatever they generate, it always require a lot of proofreading and editing (sometimes more, sometimes less). So, as opposed to all the ads and reviews of these tools that say write a 1000 word article in 2 mins - that doesn't seem true. Cause I spend a lot of time to make the post worthy of posting on the blog.
It's similar quality. But I can get 20 articles in 2 clicks instead of 200 clicks. That's a numbers game for me. 3 hours vs 3 minutes. I have a good set of prompts for every category to streamline it.
 

RowdySadjit

Regular Member
Joined
Dec 20, 2021
Messages
233
Reaction score
90
Yeah I prefer Jasper/Jarvis above all the other tools I have tried, thus far.
I am wondering why they are always changing their business name. Is it due to legal issues?

Conversant ... jasper ... jarvis

Only OpenAI API worked for me. It's both cheap and it is the original piece these companies are reselling to you.
I would recommend it to anyone trying to use this powerful model. There will be more, so expect more.
Making own gpt-3 based tool is one of the methods people don't talk about, but I tell you, make one and you will have $100 per day if you post it to ProductHunt doing nothing.
The most expensive token gets me 5k words for 30 cents.
If you made a software to beat gpt-3 openai I would be expecting a hell of a lot more than $100 per day!!! :p
 

reaaski

Power Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2013
Messages
637
Reaction score
951
If you made a software to beat gpt-3 openai I would be expecting a hell of a lot more than $100 per day!!! :p
I said software based on gpt-3 openai. $100 per day is beer money for any AI, even full API based.
It's a dotcom type of thing. You can bank hard without doing too much.
Many people on SEO forums got their wallets fat only because they entered SEO tools business at the right time.
Now we have this opportunity again.

To rock, you just need to know what to do better than competition to make more clients happy.
Many of them aren't even aware you can get OpenAI just by signing up via Google account.
This is white hat business, so it's easier to promote and process.
 

RowdySadjit

Regular Member
Joined
Dec 20, 2021
Messages
233
Reaction score
90
This is white hat business, so it's easier to promote and process.
Also everyone and their mother is doing a gpt-3 based ai solution so don't know what makes you think it is so easy?
 

MisterF

Jr. Executive VIP
Jr. VIP
Joined
Nov 29, 2009
Messages
25,831
Reaction score
38,922
Website
www.blackhatworld.com
I am wondering why they are always changing their business name. Is it due to legal issues?

Conversant ... jasper ... jarvis
Yeah someone said Jarvis was their trademarked name or something so they changed to Jasper. So a bit of a boo boo there, one would suggest.
 

gpt2

Newbie
Joined
Apr 4, 2022
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Website
gpt-2.com
It's similar quality. But I can get 20 articles in 2 clicks instead of 200 clicks. That's a numbers game for me. 3 hours vs 3 minutes. I have a good set of prompts for every category to streamline it.
Which software do you use ?
 

sarah2022

Newbie
Joined
Apr 16, 2022
Messages
28
Reaction score
11
They charge you a fixed fee, are slow and basically at their level it's weird they still have limited language support.
Translation to any language with this type of solution should be provided out of the box.
It was good before gpt-3, but now they're behind.
Hi..sorry but please answer..

do you mean article forge is not good anymore???
do they using gpt-3? or what?
becuase their price is so high as jarvis
so I Think there's a price there's a quality???
they're behind thats mean they're using traditional tech?
 

reaaski

Power Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2013
Messages
637
Reaction score
951
Hi..sorry but please answer..

do you mean article forge is not good anymore???
do they using gpt-3? or what?
becuase their price is so high as jarvis
so I Think there's a price there's a quality???
they're behind thats mean they're using traditional tech?
Yes, they're using traditional tech. They have their own technology that was created years ago (but is still updated).

They don't use GPT-3. They have the same pricing since years and they don't update it.

Jarvis is better for single articles. Article Forge is good for mass article generation.

But you can do mass article generation using GPT-3 with OpenAI if you have proper skills or someone that can help you code.

As far as I know, Jarvis and other tools put limitations on users and are much more expensive than original davinci-002 from OpenAi.

It all depends on your needs. For sure there are some niches where ArticleForge would be useful.
 
Last edited:

sarah2022

Newbie
Joined
Apr 16, 2022
Messages
28
Reaction score
11
Yes, they're using traditional tech. They have their own technology that was created years ago (but is still updated).

They don't use GPT-3. They have the same pricing since years and they don't update it.

Jarvis is better for single articles. Article Forge is good for mass article generation.

But you can do mass article generation using GPT-3 with OpenAI if you have proper skills or someone that can help you code.

As far as I know, Jarvis and other tools put limitations on users and are much more expensive than original davinci-002 from OpenAi.

It all depends on your needs. For sure there are some niches where ArticleForge would be useful.
Thank u for your explanation...
I got problem with their intro for article..
hopefully they will get upgrade ..
the reason why I like this because they offer free trial with paypal..
I don't find any AI writter with offer paypal free trial nowadays :(
 

reaaski

Power Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2013
Messages
637
Reaction score
951
Thank u for your explanation...
I got problem with their intro for article..
hopefully they will get upgrade ..
the reason why I like this because they offer free trial with paypal..
I don't find any AI writter with offer paypal free trial nowadays :(
Copy.ai is free, 100 free generations, sign up is available with google auth.
https://beta.openai.com is open and you get free $20 for confirming phone number.
 

tesselate

Newbie
Joined
Apr 4, 2022
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Anyone here use AI writing softwares for money sites? Which one do you use? Seems like Jasper (Jarvis) is the market leader. Looking for the absolute best one to generate content for money site.
I am new here but I have been having success with the Open GPT-3 language model from Open AI... Not for any sort of production implementation but for development experimentation. It can be implemented fairly easily using python or even simple CURL commands. If anyone knows more about it and whether it is feasible for a production deployment, I am all ears. :)
 
Joined
Apr 28, 2022
Messages
13
Reaction score
10
Anyone here use AI writing softwares for money sites? Which one do you use? Seems like Jasper (Jarvis) is the market leader. Looking for the absolute best one to generate content for money site.
The last time I used Jarvis they had something like a 500 word output max and whatever the AI wrote was extremely clunky. I wouldn't recommend using an AI writer to be honest.
 

reaaski

Power Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2013
Messages
637
Reaction score
951
The last time I used Jarvis they had something like a 500 word output max and whatever the AI wrote was extremely clunky. I wouldn't recommend using an AI writer to be honest.
Yeah. I made my own tool. It works a little bit better, but it's still missing a lot of facts.

Paraphrasing is better, but that's not what OpenAI is for. So noobs don't have easy to use API. :)

I believe all those Rytr, Jarvis owners and so on are just greedy mother*ers who took opportunity of an early access to OpenAI and everyone thinks they're somehow special.

Now these tools are perceived as crap as this is open to everyone. Start-ups based on other start-ups always smell 10 miles away.

They don't even have good customer support and charge so much for those tokens it's not even making sense to resell those articles.

Because... who in this world is using beta tools in development and advertising them as production ready? F***ing opportunists.
 
Last edited:

sci0n

Registered Member
Joined
Oct 21, 2021
Messages
88
Reaction score
135
Website
coinpub.org
anyone here using articleforge??
a pioneer of AI writter..
I tested them last year and liked them. Ultimately went for Jasper but we'll probably switch to Articleforge when the subscription runs out.

I talked to someone from AF because I noticed that AF articles pass open-ai detectors. So the guy from AF said that they have a different algo (not gpt-2 or gpt-3) that is similar to google's MUM. He said he thinks that makes AF generated content better to rank in google. He was obviously selling the product but the fact is that the common detectors cannot detect AF content as AI generated.
 
Top