What is up with all these tools being inaccurate? It kind of gets annoying when searching for markets to dominate. Example: Hip Hop Songs When I first went for that keyword, the Google Keyword Tool: Code: https://adwords.google.com/select/KeywordToolExternal?forceLegacy=true Said that the keyword "Hip Hop Songs" gets about 110,000 exact global searches monthly. I thought to myself "Wow this would be a great keyword to dominate", several weeks later, I'm ranked 2nd position for Hip Hop Songs and I get 60-80 searches per day! According to the Google tool the keyword gets 3,667 exact searches per day, I'm 2nd position on the first page receiving not even 5% of that. (Right now I'm 3rd position for the past 48 hours) I checked the same keyword with Market Samurai, and it says 3,616 exact searches per day, and that 1st position should expect about 1,518 searches per day. This also makes no sense because you would think 2nd position would get more than 60-80 searches per day if 1st position gets 1,518! You would also think a keyword like Hip Hop Songs gets a lot of searches? I then checked Webmaster Tools for Google Analytics, and I only see from August 1 - August 29, about 1,900 clicks out of 8,100 impressions which is 23% of clicks for the keyword Hip Hop Songs. So what this is saying is that in the past month about 8,100+ people have put in Hip Hop Songs into Google and potentially could have clicked on my site, which I highly doubt. So conclusion is that Google Keyword Tool is inaccurate, Market Samurai is inaccurate (since it most likely uses Google Keyword Tool), and Google Webmaster Tools makes no sense. You would think Market Samurai would be at least accurate since you have to pay for the full version. (Free trial allows you to search keywords) Hopefully a new tool comes out that is actually accurate for once. Anyone else have any similar experiences? Also, this is why I don't take any "Gurus" advice serious when they release products saying "I'm first page for so and so keyword making $15,000 per month".