A dozen old websites with AI. After months, zero traffic. So what?

geomink

Regular Member
Joined
Dec 22, 2015
Messages
403
Reaction score
123
Added thousand of AI posts to aged high DA websites.
Zero results after months.
:(
So what?
 
There are people on the forum who succeeded with AI content.

If think you didn't do a good enough job.

Open the journeys subforum, find these blogging journeys with AI content, read carefully each and every post an OP made, and try to find where you took the wrong path.
 
Added thousand of AI posts to aged high DA websites.
Zero results after months.
:(
So what?
Are your posts indexed?
How many article did you publish daily?
Did you drip-feed the thousand articles?
Anything in the GSC?

I publish on fresh domains and it's working.
I do optimize the content manually after posting.
Sometimes when I don't have time I edit them to optimize at later date.
No more than 10 post published per day per domain rest are scheduled to a random later date.
 
Is the site around a topic, and able to give a new angle on that, and an interesting destination for visitors? Or is it just general articles on your site? I and many others use Ai daily for posts with no ranking difficulties.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Toz
There are people on the forum who succeeded with AI content.

If think you didn't do a good enough job.

Open the journeys subforum, find these blogging journeys with AI content, read carefully each and every post an OP made, and try to find where you took the wrong path.

I read them all over and over again and tried to apply what I understood.
Some are intended for programmers and I don't understand them.
In the others they explain everything, except - obviously and rightly - that "couple of little things" they don't say that are the decisive ones
 
Are your posts indexed?
Yes, almost 100% of them

How many article did you publish daily?
Tried almost everything:
- Just a few posts a day
- A few dozen a day
- A few hundred a day
- Continuously post every day for long periods of time
- Posting for a while and stopping
- Post for a while, stop and then resume posting
And so on.....

Did you drip-feed the thousand articles?
Yes in some cases and no in others, as I wrote above

Anything in the GSC?
A few spikes in impressions after a few days from the start and then nothing more and a few very occasional clicks; but these are all old sites that were already sporadically receiving a few clicks

I do optimize the content manually after posting.
I don't want to spend time manually; if it had worked so automatically, fine, otherwise, nothing....
 
Is the site around a topic, and able to give a new angle on that, and an interesting destination for visitors? Or is it just general articles on your site? I and many others use Ai daily for posts with no ranking difficulties.
It is not just one site but about fifteen sites, in different niches (health, home, hobby, DIY, fashion, etc...)
I don't even look at the content; it's created with AI
 
Yes, almost 100% of them


Tried almost everything:
- Just a few posts a day
- A few dozen a day
- A few hundred a day
- Continuously post every day for long periods of time
- Posting for a while and stopping
- Post for a while, stop and then resume posting
And so on.....


Yes in some cases and no in others, as I wrote above


A few spikes in impressions after a few days from the start and then nothing more and a few very occasional clicks; but these are all old sites that were already sporadically receiving a few clicks


I don't want to spend time manually; if it had worked so automatically, fine, otherwise, nothing....
So, you "don't want to spend time manually" and ask why it doesn't work? Do you think that by posting thousands of jack sh!t posts with no on-page seo optimization you will get organic traffic to that website? I don't think so, it's not that easy.
 
Do you think that by posting thousands of jack sh!t posts with no on-page seo optimization you will get organic traffic to that website?
Yes, of course, many do.
In any case I do the on-page (title, h, videos, internal LB, etc...)
 
I don't want to spend time manually; if it had worked so automatically, fine, otherwise, nothing....
With time and changes by Google lot's of things change.
This approach used to work in past but it doesn't work that efficiently now.
I am not telling to perfect the content optimization but it should be adjusted to an extent so it's acceptable in serps.
For example:
Article should be well structured with headings and sub headings.
Topical relevance is necessary.
Use keyword in the headings & sub headings.
 
Article should be well structured with headings and sub headings.
Topical relevance is necessary.
Use keyword in the headings & sub headings.
All articles are structured with 4 or 5 Heading and subheading and each heading and subheading contains keywords in topic with the whole article
 
This approach used to work in past but it doesn't work that efficiently now
Indeed.
Perhaps when methods begin to be made public on the forums, it means either that they are now at their peak, or, in many cases, that they no longer work by now
This is just my assumption, which may be wrong of course
 
Second, many people rank instead
Are you sure they rank with your approach?
All articles are structured with 4 or 5 Heading and subheading and each heading and subheading contains keywords in topic with the whole article
Are they structured around the topic?

I used to do a lot of spam blogs total spun content with 70-100% copyscape uniqueness.
Now only thing that's changed is I don't spin them instead use AI content.
I still autoblog a lot even with affiliate sites.

Not going to give my exact method but here's a tip.
Don't ignore what others are ignoring based on metrics & numbers prioritise relevance over metrics.
Long tails are useful.
 
How do you do your KW research?

I don't do any, pure spam. But only about 5k pages get traffic out of 220k.
 
First of all High-level Ai content is not shit content at all.
Second, many people rank instead
Indeed.
Perhaps when methods begin to be made public on the forums, it means either that they are now at their peak, or, in many cases, that they no longer work by now
This is just my assumption, which may be wrong of course
If you can, please use the multi-quote function as it makes the threads flow much easier. How to multi-quote can be found here Newbie Guide
 
Back
Top