Discussion in 'Black Hat SEO' started by Cshark, Oct 13, 2015.
I think this is duplicated thread,
I just replied for some one exactellt like that
It's not @seoestore. It's the same post, minus outbound links, which complies with the BHW TOS. The other "duplicate" thread doesn't exist.
This was an excellent read Cshark. I echo all of your sentiments regarding providing real value to earn respect, appreciation, and patronage.
@davers, I'm glad you like my post.
I don't quite agree with #1 as this really depends on your target audience, but everything else was solid advice!
@Zwielicht Thank you for your feedback. Let's talk about #1. Do you think people don't need real information?
I actually misconstrued the purpose of #1 the first time I read it as I wasn't wearing my glasses at the time. For some reason, I read it and thought that you were trying to say that modern Internet users would only want to read long articles, but I see now that you actually wrote that entertaining and quick articles are fine for small topics while long-form articles are more appropriate to present in-depth information. I agree with this.
Sorry about that and great job on this guide!
@zwlelleht It( oversight) happens to the best of us. No problem at all.
Separate names with a comma.