Search results

Hmmm.. well I have an odd theory that it could be due to edu/gov links -- if your packages had edu/gov links in the mix then perhaps that may have hit some niches and not others... were niches that should have virtually no edu/gov links get hit?

Nice post, thanks for sharing.... However, I don't believe on-page factors are as important as the off-page factors. My gut tells me this is more about link building. Anything that looks artificial is being hit. One possible reason why direct crappy links to the money site are not being hit are...

I also get the impression that the penalty was mostly based on backlinking rather than content. Also, I can also confirm that backlinks with poorly spun content does not seem to have been hit... not yet anyway. Someone else has already mentioned it, but it looks like link pyramids have been...

I wasn't trying to saying that this is old in a critical way, just trying to determine if there is a new spin to the way you're friend is doing it. I've heard both sides of the argument, some say that you don't need to use a separate ip host for each site some saying that google can easily...

I have read about this method, it's pretty old from what I understand... I was wondering though, does your friend host all those 301s on separate ip addresses? From what I've read they recommend concealing your footprint as much as possible since it is so black hat... Has anyone tried this using...