Search results

Data from two public cloaking networks using wpCloaker Network 1: 1.2 - 1.5 million hits/day Network 2: 450 - 550k hits/day These are 7 day averages In other words... cloaking is doing just fine.

The major commercial services all have some level of guides and scenarios that walk you through how to use their service. This isn't a full on training course -- as people have said, that's just not available for cloaking in a generic sense. But you can use their help desk and guides to get...

I have every incentive to tell you to switch cloakers and buy another service... but really that is probably not the right thing to do. If you are using one of the larger commercial services out there then report through their support desk and work with them on traffic analysis. They'll plug the...

If you are trying to do any form of link sculpting then you should use dynamic links with an external JS file controlling the click behavior. The search engines can crawl and execute external javascript files these days but it isn't something that will normally happen without cause.

The best advice I can offer is to use a supported cloaking service -- one with good support that will answer questions. Cloaking Adwords is pretty common and all the main commercial cloakers can do it and are constantly doing the traffic analysis to add new fingerprints and IPs to cover Google's...

Cloaking doesn't impact how to set up campaigns. Your account's age and spend will partly impact how much scrutiny you get on campaigns so with newer campaigns you want to make sure that your "normal" or "safe" page completely complies with TOS and you might even want to run it for a while to...

I think the OP missed a vital point about FB -- the platform gets a lot of user complaints. "Bait and switch" is not typically a viable option on FB without cycling through a lot of accounts because of the amount of manual complaints filed. This is why the niche is important. Folks that are...

The main "trick" the past few years has been to run burst campaigns of 1-5 days just before payouts. Buy cheap ppv traffic to a lander. Accounts won't last long so you'll have to cycle.

@thedorf he did give all the code. Those other files are the landing pages to show various bots/users. You would make these yourself based on your campaign needs. Again, be careful using this because reverse DNS is not reliable in general and slow enough to cause issues. Oh, and if you look at...

Hiding the referrer is not really "cloaking". This subforum is more about showing bots, spiders, reviewers, partners one set of content and real human visitors a different set of content (an offer). P202 and the other trackers all use DMR (direct meta refresh) to blank the referrer. You can do...

@Sean04 yes, PM me and I'll take you through it.

contact your cloaker's tech support line and explain the issue... some networks work better with a content replacement instead of a redirect, etc.

reverse DNS using PHP is typically very very slow (multiple seconds) Google doesn't just use bots from their own IP ranges - this renders reverse DNS less effective

Any of the commercial cloaking services will do what you need here (even though this is a very old post originally). You want something with a support line that works with you and actively does traffic analysis to identify new fingerprints and as needed, IPs.

"Professional readable articles" is the issue. If you want it to truly look good you have to manually write/re-write. All of the spinners end up mangling the readability so it largely becomes a matter of choice. I agree that WordAI is very good for what it does but honestly SpinRewriter and TBS...

My opinions are of course biased but hopefully balanced... you need a cloaking service with good support because nothing is every foolproof. Second, you need (much) more than just a list of IPs. Facebook like all the other larger networks use reviewers, shadow bots, and their partners to...

US traffic on FB and Adwords can be more challenging -- it depends on the niche and the offer and how good your "normal" page is -- what you show the reviewers and spiders. Some offers like diet and dating get a lot of user complaints and this causes more scrutiny in a campaign than you'd like...

Cloaking is ALWAYS risky. Always. No service can give you a 100% risk free certainty. It's just not how it goes. The good commercial services maintain large lists of fingerprints to identify partners and reviewers but this is never perfect. That's why you need a good tech support line for when...

There are fewer and fewer commercial cloakers it seems that cater to organic/SEO traffic. I know we do (then again, I am biased) and you should ask the other commercial tools that have good support as well. At some level organic traffic is easier to cloak than paid traffic -- all the same issues...

All the commercial cloakers can cloak Bing Ads and have support desks for when questions and issues arise. I suggest you use one of them.