Search results

I was still hoping for some big surprises with this core update, but it turned out to be so underwhelming.

I agree with what you said. In fact, SEO doesn’t really have “white hat” or “black hat.” Even what is called white hat SEO is ultimately aimed at meeting search engine requirements to gain rankings and traffic. Black hat SEO is essentially the same; the difference is that it is officially...

I didn't see any fluctuations; everything seemed the same as usual.

I suspect that what Google calls a “core update” this time, which is said to take about three weeks, is actually more of a ranking fine-tuning rather than a true core update. This update also doesn’t seem to be targeting fully automated AI-generated content. If it were, given Google’s technical...

Google announced a core update on December 11th, but so far, there haven't been any major fluctuations in search results. Everything seems pretty much the same as usual. Is anyone else experiencing this?

To perform the analysis, you need to understand the function of these parameters, such as the parameters on the PC side as follows: PC Side wd: Search query (PC side) oq: Previous search query pn: Represents the search results page number. The first page does not have this parameter; the...

You need to confirm whether the appearance and rise in rankings is sustainable. If the rankings disappear after a week, it's just a temporary boost of authority and credibility from the platform.

If you can do SEO targeting this, the traffic will be huge.

Google is different; it uses multiple algorithms to identify factors and doesn't determine rankings based on a single signal.

Yes. Baidu’s underlying algorithm is essentially handed over to user behavior. As long as the feedback data shows that users “like” it, then even if the content is garbage or the page only has a few words, Baidu will still consider it the best result. This leads to people manipulating this kind...

I created around a dozen websites to test different approaches to using AI for bulk content generation, updating each site with dozens of new pieces every day. I discovered that whenever the AI characteristics in the content were too obvious, the sites would typically experience a sharp drop in...

It's useless. Google detects AI not by looking at the surface text, but by analyzing the characteristics typical of AI-generated versus human-written content. As long as it's written by AI, regardless of the content, it can be detected—unless you can break the patterns of AI generation and make...

Many people use Baidu SEO methods to test Google search rankings, but see no results; Google is stronger.

Not only is AI SEO fast, but even Baidu's SEO is very quick. They utilize constructing search parameters to directly generate fake IP visits, sending feedback to Baidu’s servers to inform them that users are searching for this keyword and that they like this website. In this way, if you start in...

My understanding is different from yours. Google says it doesn’t penalize AI-written content, but it does penalize fully automated AI-generated content. So the issue isn’t where it’s published, but whether there’s evidence of human review.

Why is it that when I, a human, write content and ask AI to help me improve it—while keeping my style and my edits visible—the final output still ends up being AI-generated content?

The problem now is that AI-generated content is genuinely helpful to users; in many cases, it's even better than human-generated content. This is useful to users. However, Google currently dislikes fully automated AI-generated content, so it needs to avoid it.

I know that besides GPT, there are AI-powered services in China that specialize in SEO for it. It only takes half a day; you can ask the AI a question, and it will recommend services to you. However, it seems to be ineffective against the US-based ChatGP. Does anyone have experience with this?

If you want to use AI to automatically create content and then upload it to a website in batches, how can you ensure that the AI-generated content is so sophisticated that even Google's algorithm cannot recognize it?

Yes, I think this activity is not long-term, because it was just released, so it is only effective in the short term.