Search results

Going viral is not always a sign that something is wrong. Sometimes automated systems become stricter when an account gets a lot of activity quickly.

Yeah, this happens sometimes even after months, I would check policy updates, billing issues, and any small changes that might have triggered the review.

Sometimes a second appeal can work, but only when you provide new details or proof instead of just repeating the old explanation.

But yeah, for actual memories, most people still prefer real photography. AI versions are more like a visual add-on than a replacement.

Some niches still show weak AI content ranking briefly, but long-term visibility almost always needs human refinement and supporting SEO work.

It’s not just stricter, it’s more automated now. New accounts need time, engagement, and normal behavior patterns before they get full visibility.

yeah your landing page probs needs a native-style prelander, taboola clicks hate straight sales pages.

yeah i seen same thing tbh, adsterra rates been dropping hard past months even with US/UK traffic direct links dont pay like before anymore try rotating placements or push to a LP first, direct link gets capped fast also x traffic can be hit or miss, depends on engagement a lot

Looking to spy on competitive Native Ad campaigns (Taboola/Outbrain). What tool is currently the most updated and accurate? Is Adplexity still the king or is there a better alternative?

As far as I know, they don't offer a free trial, so you’ll have to go straight to a paid plan to get started. I’d definitely suggest reaching out to their support team first, though. They can help you understand which plan fits your niche best and make sure your setup is solid before you go...

I’m on Facebook currently. FB is strict with reviews, but the filtering is holding up. Haven't tried it on Google myself yet, but heard it works there too if your white page is strong.

I’ve tried a few cloakers before for Nutra campaigns. Some worked well in the begining, but after a few days the filtering wasn’t that good and my accounts started getting issues. Recently I heard about TrafficGaurdian in a few groups, so I decided to give it a try. Their support helped me with...

AI definitely makes automation easier but i don't think it makes cloaking "safe". At the end of the platforms and crawlers keep improving detection too Ai can just make the process faster and more dynamic, but the risk is still there. From what I’ve seen, many people still use normal cloakers...

Usually I test ads first. If the ad isn’t getting good CTR, the landing page test won’t matter much because you won’t get enough traffic. So I start by testing different ad creatives and headlines to find the best CTR. Once I find a winning ad, then I start split-testing landing pages to improve...

aged account is good but still run small campaign first for few days, once it spends fine then increase budget slowly.

usually google doesn’t care much about nameservers, they mostly review the landing page and policy stuff, but big changes during review can sometimes trigger extra checks.

I think it helps with optimization if you give it good data and creatives. But sometimes it feels random because the system decisions are not very clear.

I will recommend to Start with a small budget and test different creatives to see what works best. Also use a good cloaker and prelander because gambling ads often get flagged on Facebook.

usually google flags accounts for policy stuff or unusual spend, check email for reason, sometimes even small changes trigger pause, contact support to fix fast.

focus on exact match + location targeting, use call extensions, show reviews, and target high intent keywords, retarget visitors who check your site, works better than broad campaigns.