Search results

I feel like this would totally kill my engagement as a hook.

So using multiple different clips as V.O (Different youtube videos/perspectives of a story) wouldn't be enough?

Sorry I misunderstood your explanation! That's an interesting concept, I'll give it a try thanks :)

Thanks for the reply mate. I see these on movie shorts, where someone is directly trying to avoid copyright. I'm not concerned about copyright for my shorts, more the manual approval for monetisation from Youtube. It seems a good method, although my concern would be damaging retention for my...

Do you have any examples of what you mean?

There are hundreds of more popular podcast channels that aren't monetised. I haven't applied for monetisation yet, so don't want to fall at the first hurdle if there's something I can do now to have my videos be monetisable!

Appreciate the reply man. Yeah totally get you on subjectivity. I do all the things you mentioned (besides original commentary) so will see how it goes. My professional background is in film editing so I'm not worried about appeal/quality, It's just eligibility for monetisation, I don't want to...

I edit them heavily, my question is if drawing multiple sources of a story/event into a cohesive short constitutes "transformative content". Completely agree with low quality videos but these are high quality. The Podcast clip itself just acts as voiceover. Interesting about "insightful...

Started my first channel this week, Hit 1.5M views / 2k subs (Shorts), so creeping up to monetisation eligibility pretty quickly. I post Podcast stories, heavily edited (audio is basically just V.O track with visuals being my own animated gfx/stock/etc) & stories are pulled from multiple...