Search results

You can actually do that, I used to do it with Facebook groups. If the sub reddit allows you to post and they don't automatically delete it. You can bump your posts with the use of upvotes. I did this way back in 2017/2018/2019. It works, unless there's been a change with how reddit ranks stuff.

Discount has been sent to your PM, kindly check.

I just saw a better and more deep analysis of Bing's AI chat search results. It isn't as bad as most predicted. Check out the below Twitter thread

I saw these two; https://searchengineland.com/test-driving-the-new-bing-392841 But I don't think it's open to the general public, I wasn't able to use it as I only accessed to old Bimg. Apparently the chat bot feature would be on different tab just like the image tab.

Most people who are good at it, do both. Rendering services earns you more money if you have many clients but with many clients you would need assistance (i.e less money to you). For myself, I do both.

Google would be shooting itself in the foot if it obliterates all/major traffic going to websites. The side effects would be worse

We two elephants fight the grass suffers.

Discount has been sent to the both of you and your questions answered as well.

I saw somewhere that it uses Bing's index.

I predicted this on one other thread. You can't steal my content and market it as 'AI generated'. That's bullshit.

This is the site: prod.uhrs.playmsn.com You might want to check out this short thread: Traffic from prod.uhrs.playmsn.com | BlackHatWorld

Obviously yes,

I'm mistaking You for Yep. Why don't they combine finances and expertise, and take over from Google.

Google has been working on AI for several years, so a little word to let the world know they've been on this for years and are not new comers. Let's see how it all play out.

Last week I posted this case study by Matthew Woodward and it received mixed reactions. Today he has updated it, this time including OpenAI's AI content detection tool. The results are equally interesting especially as only a little over 50% of the articles passed its test. Perhaps it's what...

Not so new, it's owned by Ahrefs I think. They should figure out a way to reach as many more people as possible

Yes backlinks are still very relevant and have proven they can be the difference between your sites success and failures. With strategies I'd recommend you acquire backlinks from sites with traffic or have proven results. While for PBNs, quality homepage PBNs work great.

Whenever I conclude a link acquisition transaction with a website owner, I usually ask if they have other sites. I always recommend that to people.

For some sites I spend $500 per month on others more. My backlinks acquisition strategy heavily relies on spending less and on only valuable sites that are worth it.

Aren't the keywords too difficult for your website? Also how optimized are they? Google reps often say, that your site/page is indexed doesn't mean it'll be shown on search result.