- Jun 20, 2015
- 5,365
- 935
Working in link building, I've noticed that the way people evaluate backlinks has changed quite a bit.
Earlier, many clients mainly focused on metrics like DA, DR, traffic and the number of links delivered. These days, more buyers are asking about topical relevance, organic traffic, placement quality, indexing and whether links can actually contribute to their SEO goals.
From a seller's perspective, this also makes me to help them to rank better when they have clear understanding on what they want. but in some case it harder to explain the value of a backlink campaign. A link with impressive metrics doesn't necessarily mean it's a valuable placement.
I'm curious about how other SEO professionals are handling this.
Earlier, many clients mainly focused on metrics like DA, DR, traffic and the number of links delivered. These days, more buyers are asking about topical relevance, organic traffic, placement quality, indexing and whether links can actually contribute to their SEO goals.
From a seller's perspective, this also makes me to help them to rank better when they have clear understanding on what they want. but in some case it harder to explain the value of a backlink campaign. A link with impressive metrics doesn't necessarily mean it's a valuable placement.
I'm curious about how other SEO professionals are handling this.
- Are niche edits, guest posts or brand mentions getting better client demand?
- Have you changed your link-building approach over the last couple of years?
- What do you consider a genuinely valuable backlink today?