Myth: Every Service Needs a Separate Landing Page

Monsterer

Elite Member
Jr. VIP
Joined
Nov 26, 2015
Messages
4,803
Reaction score
1,065
The current reality depends on the service and search intent.

Separate pages may be useful when services have distinct audiences, processes, or requirements.

A combined page may be better when the offerings are closely related, and users benefit from comparing them in one place.

Before splitting pages, review the current content, query data, and search results.

The goal is not to create the maximum number of URLs. The goal is to help visitors find the right information with minimal confusion.
 
Good point. Having too many pages can make it harder for visitors to choose, especially when the services are almost the same.
 
I agree with this creating a separate page for every service can make a site harder to manage if the content is too similar i think checking search intent first is the best approach if people are looking for different things separate pages make sense otherwise one well organized page may be enough.
 
Kept splitting pages for every service name I'd offer. catnipfencing's booking test stuck with me, since emergency plumbing and a renovation clearly need different details before anyone books.
 
The current reality depends on the service and search intent.

Separate pages may be useful when services have distinct audiences, processes, or requirements.

A combined page may be better when the offerings are closely related, and users benefit from comparing them in one place.

Before splitting pages, review the current content, query data, and search results.

The goal is not to create the maximum number of URLs. The goal is to help visitors find the right information with minimal confusion.
these pages might even compete with each other, which is why I normally check whether each page has a unique contribution. have you ever tried combining several pages to see what happens with traffic/leads?
 
I’d decide based on search intent, not the number of services. If people search for each service differently, separate pages make sense. If they’re looking for basically the same thing, one strong page may do the job better.
Exactly, I would start by doing research on the SERP results for each of the services separately. If there is a difference between the intent and the pages ranking for it, then separate pages will make more sense than combining them.
 
The current reality depends on the service and search intent.

Separate pages may be useful when services have distinct audiences, processes, or requirements.

A combined page may be better when the offerings are closely related, and users benefit from comparing them in one place.

Before splitting pages, review the current content, query data, and search results.

The goal is not to create the maximum number of URLs. The goal is to help visitors find the right information with minimal confusion.
yeah I usually just google the serps for both nd see if google is ranking similar pages. If the purpose is pretty much the same, I'd rather improve one page than split it into several page with almost the same content.
 
The current reality depends on the service and search intent.

Separate pages may be useful when services have distinct audiences, processes, or requirements.

A combined page may be better when the offerings are closely related, and users benefit from comparing them in one place.

Before splitting pages, review the current content, query data, and search results.

The goal is not to create the maximum number of URLs. The goal is to help visitors find the right information with minimal confusion.
Agreed, I wouldn’t create separate pages just to target more keywords. If the services have different search intent, separate pages make sense. if not one strong page can do the goog job
 
Before merging service pages, I'd check which ones already get organic traffic or have backlinks. Removing those pages without proper redirects could hurt existing rankings. If the pages are combined, updating internal links is also important so they don't keep pointing to the old URLs.
 
The current reality depends on the service and search intent.

Separate pages may be useful when services have distinct audiences, processes, or requirements.

A combined page may be better when the offerings are closely related, and users benefit from comparing them in one place.

Before splitting pages, review the current content, query data, and search results.

The goal is not to create the maximum number of URLs. The goal is to help visitors find the right information with minimal confusion.
the reason why I find it easier to look at the search results first before dividing the page is because sometimes the search engine ranks the same type of page for both of the keywords. If the intentions are the same then I think it would be better to create one page with great content nd links.
 
I agree with checking the search results first. If Google shows the same kind of page for both services, one strong page usually works better than two thin ones. I would only split them when the intent and the audience are clearly different, and each page can stand on its own.
 
The current reality depends on the service and search intent.

Separate pages may be useful when services have distinct audiences, processes, or requirements.

A combined page may be better when the offerings are closely related, and users benefit from comparing them in one place.

Before splitting pages, review the current content, query data, and search results.

The goal is not to create the maximum number of URLs. The goal is to help visitors find the right information with minimal confusion.
It is always my practice to asses the results of each search on both the engines before proceding to design two page. sometimes both the topic result in identical results on google, which means designing two pages will serve no purpose. It would be better to have a single page with all the content nd internal links on it.
 
Back
Top