I've started focusing more on long-tail keywords and content that answers specific user problems. Brand searches are also becoming more important. I don't think informational content is dead, but it needs to offer something AI summaries can't easily replace.
That's a great approach, lunajans. Double-downing on long-tail keywords that solve hyper-specific user problems makes a lot of sense. AI summaries can easily scrape definitions, but they can't easily replicate deep, hands-on troubleshooting.
Focusing on brand searches is also a smart move. When people trust a brand enough to search for it directly alongside a query, they usually bypass the AI snippet entirely because they want that specific brand's take.
Out of curiosity, are you also adjusting your link-building strategy to support this shift? Personally, I feel that getting links from niche-relevant sites that actually drive real referral traffic is becoming way more important than just chasing raw metric scores now.
Thanks for that reply. I agree that solving for the user is the part that really matters, and your point about bottom of funnel content makes sense because it gives people a clear next step instead of just another generic answer. That is a good way to think about it in a zero click world.
Absolutely, Shakeel. When everyone is chasing volume, focusing on conversion and deep intent is where the real value lies now. If the content doesn't give them a reason to click through or take action, we're just feeding the AI engine for free.
Appreciate you stopping by and sharing your thoughts on this
All my sites are small and commercial and used to sell mobile proxies. I get the same wall anyway.
i paid for dataforseo for 66 cents to check how much my main sites get cited in ai overviews and chatgpt. zero for both. the main result for mobile proxy queries is youtube.
so i ship a video alongside every artcle now and i have stopped caring whether the article gets cited. i get both those who click and those who watch. i think there is alot of opportunity in youtube for businesses because its the hardest form of content to create, which is long form video content.
i think the only thing that compounds is your brand term that i would work on mostly and in the process, also fulfil what the other channels want
That DataForSeo test is a solid reality check, xavierfok. It just proves that for high-intent commercial niches, search engines prefer raw user utility over generic LLM text.
Embedding video alongside text is a brilliant pivot. Google is heavily favoring video carousels and YouTube shorts for transactional intents right now because it's harder for AI to easily replicate firsthand product testing or setup guides. You're effectively building an informational moat that AI overviews can't easily scrape.
Out of curiosity, since you're dominating both text and video spaces for those queries, have you noticed if those video embeds are pulling schema-driven rich snippets or driving direct referral traffic, even if the written article itself gets bypassed on the SERP?
Don't move away from informational content completely. It still helps build topical authority and introduces people to your brand, even if some searches don't generate clicks. You can focus more on commercial pages, comparison articles, and content that helps users make decisions.
Also, work on brand mentions through relevant publications and listicles to build visibility beyond your own website. Getting cited in AI answers is useful, but building brand recognition so people search for you directly is just as important.
Completely agree on building out that topical authority, Titans. Leaving informational content behind completely is definitely risky because it forms the baseline of the whole funnel.
The point about off-site brand mentions and listicles is huge. Getting featured on relevant blogs not only builds trust with users but also drops those essential contextual entity cues that search engines look for. If you can't win the click on your own SERP spot, winning it via a third-party mention is a smart workaround.
Thanks for dropping by and adding this perspective!
Agree on the TL;DR and bulleted answers, those seem to help the most. Schema is harder to prove for me, so I’d love to see if anyone has tested it side by side
That makes total sense. Isolating behind-the-scenes code as a single factor is always tough without a clean, side-by-side test environment. Direct summaries and bullet points are definitely the low-hanging fruit because the scrapers can read them instantly. Hopefully, someone in the thread with a dedicated testing setup can share some fresh data on it soon
Yes, there is a trend for informational SEO to be overtaken by AI Overviews and other AI platforms. This means users are getting direct answers to their questions. I wouldn’t completely ignore informational SEO. But I would use it to build topical authority and brand awareness, but would focus on using BOFU keywords, commercial intent and conversion focused pages.
Overall I feel there is huge potential to integrate traditional SEO with AEO, GEO and brand strategies. The focus is moving away from just focusing on rankings and looking at increasing visibility, brand searches, quality traffic and conversions.
Bringing AEO and GEO into the mix is a massive point, Guestwriting. It’s wild how fast the focus is shifting from traditional search algorithms to figuring out how to get a brand recognized inside an LLM's knowledge graph.
Optimization isn't just a search bar game anymore; it's about being part of the training data. Melding that with high-intent commercial content is definitely where the real conversion wins are going to hide moving forward.
Really appreciate you dropping those terms into the thread, gave me some great food for thought!