Taking over two SEO projects with suspicious backlink profiles: keep the domains or start fresh?

Raflucs

Newbie
Joined
Oct 23, 2024
Messages
15
Reaction score
6
Hi everyone,

Hope this is the right place to ask.

I'm currently discussing an SEO contract with a client for two websites. The problem is that the previous SEO provider seems to have used some questionable tactics, mainly to artificially increase the domains' authority scores.

Both domains used to have authority scores above 30, but recently they've dropped to almost zero.

I've had a look at their backlink profiles and found quite a few suspicious links, although some seem to be good quality. Both domains are around 6–7 years old, so they do have some history behind them.

On top of that, one of the websites has been getting tons of spam lately, especially through its contact form.

I'm going to rebuild both websites anyway, so now I'm wondering whether it makes more sense to keep the existing domains and try to clean up the backlinks (possibly using Google's Disavow Tool), or just start over with fresh domains.

What worries me is that the domains might already have been affected by the previous SEO work, and I'm not sure if trying to clean up the backlink profiles could make things worse.

The strange thing is that, despite a recent drop, both websites are still ranking reasonably well for some keywords.

What would you do in this situation? Would you try to recover the existing domains or start fresh?

And what would you check before making that decision?

Curious to hear your thoughts, especially if you've dealt with something similar.

Thanks!
 
if they’re still ranking for some keywords I’d first check GSC for manual actions and indexing issues. Also 3rd party auth scores dropping doesn’t mean Google has penalised the sites.
 
I would keep the domains and add some white hat techniques to rss feeds and quality backlinks with honest linked content.
Sometimes basic blog pages help if needed to get them for longtail keywords.
BlackHatSeo only works well with proxys and linklists; you can get quality linking that way too.
 
you should try to keep the existing domains for now especially since they are 6–7 years old and still ranking for some keywords. First you should check google search console for manual actions, indexing issues and organic traffic history. also review the backlinks to separate genuinely harmful links from just low quality ones. you shouldnt rush to use the disavow tool because not every suspicious link needs to be removed. if the domains still have good rankings and history then rebuilding them and cleaning things up seems like a better first step than starting from zero.
 
If they still rank reasonably, you can disavow the spammy links and build fresh high quality links.
Google's API leak revealed the "matchedScore" attribute, the magic backlink

1) Google sees 100 suspicious links and labels then spam

2) Google sees 100 sus links + one TRUSTED link w/ similar anchor text and trusts *all of them*
 
Just keep the existing domains for now, especially since they're still ranking for some keywords. A drop in DA/DR doesn't necessarily mean Google has penalized the sites. Check Google Search Console for manual actions, security issues, indexing changes and the actual ranking/traffic trend.
 
I wouldn't rush to abandon the domains, especially if they're still ranking for some keywords. I'd first check Google Search Console for any manual actions and look at which backlinks are actually causing problems. A drop in authority scores alone doesn't mean the domains are damaged beyond repair.
 
You can try to recover the existing domains first, especially since they still have some rankings and 6–7 years of history. A drop in DR alone isn't a reason to abandon a domain.

Also, check GSC for manual actions, organic traffic trends, lost keywords, indexed pages, and the quality of the referring domains as described.

Don't disavow every suspicious link. Google usually ignores many low quality links, so consider disavowing when it is a complete manipulative link building or a manual action.

If the domains still have organic visibility and no serious issues, you should still try to recover them.
 
Hi everyone,

Hope this is the right place to ask.

I'm currently discussing an SEO contract with a client for two websites. The problem is that the previous SEO provider seems to have used some questionable tactics, mainly to artificially increase the domains' authority scores.

Both domains used to have authority scores above 30, but recently they've dropped to almost zero.

I've had a look at their backlink profiles and found quite a few suspicious links, although some seem to be good quality. Both domains are around 6–7 years old, so they do have some history behind them.

On top of that, one of the websites has been getting tons of spam lately, especially through its contact form.

I'm going to rebuild both websites anyway, so now I'm wondering whether it makes more sense to keep the existing domains and try to clean up the backlinks (possibly using Google's Disavow Tool), or just start over with fresh domains.

What worries me is that the domains might already have been affected by the previous SEO work, and I'm not sure if trying to clean up the backlink profiles could make things worse.

The strange thing is that, despite a recent drop, both websites are still ranking reasonably well for some keywords.

What would you do in this situation? Would you try to recover the existing domains or start fresh?

And what would you check before making that decision?

Curious to hear your thoughts, especially if you've dealt with something similar.

Thanks!
If they are ranking for some keywords already keep them; otherwise start fresh.
 
Since you're rebuilding anyway, I'd keep the domains and just make sure the old URLs that actually have links get 301'd to the new pages. In my experience people lose more on a rebuild with broken URLs than they ever lost to a few bad links. The contact form spam is probably just bots and not related to the SEO stuff, a honeypot field stops most of it.
 
I’d keep the domains if they still rank. Check Search Console for manual actions and compare actual traffic against the authority score, since DA/DR dropping doesn’t always mean a Google penalty.
 
A drop from AS 30 to near zero usually just means a third-party tool stopped counting the spammy links. I'd check GSC for manual actions and 16 months of clicks first; if clicks are still there keep the domains and skip the disavow unless traffic died with those links
 
I would suggest that you leave them as they are. A drop in DA/DR to near zero from 30+ does not mean you have been hit by Google. They are 3rd party authority metrics, so they do not relate to Google's signals.

As they are 6-7 years old and ranking for some keywords, I would focus on rebuilding the sites. Fix technical and on-page issues, identify and clean up bad backlinks, and slowly build the site's authority through relevant links.

Starting with fresh domains should be the last option, not the first.
 
keep the domains unless there's an actual manual action in GSC. dropping DR/DA from sketchy links usually just means the link value evaporated, not that Google is actively holding it against you. the age and existing ranking signals are worth more than starting from zero.
 
Back
Top