Is Brand Anchors and Authority Placements to Push Stubborn Keywords ?

GSERP

GSERP

Supreme Member
Jr. VIP
Joined
Dec 17, 2015
Messages
1,388
Reaction score
480
Hi BHW folks,

I just wanna share a quick test that I ran with brand anchors and authority placements on my sample site.

I had afew keywords stuck around the 40-50 range, so I reduced exact-match anchors and used more branded ones instead. And added few authority placements over couple of weeks and left the rest of the site unchanged. After it got indexed, some kywds moved into the 20s, with a few reaching the 10–20 range. I tracked them for several weeks and most gains held, although there were normal fluctuations. Not calling this a proven formula from one test. Just sharing the result becoz those movemnt got interesting.

Anyone else tested a similar anchor mix?
 
Advertise on BHW
I haven't tested this exact mix myself yet, but the result is interesting. I like that you tracked the keywords for several weeks instead of judging the change immediately. It would be interesting to see whether the gains remain stable over a longer period, especially after normal ranking fluctuations.
 
This and spreading out the backlinks is very important.
 
Yeah, I agree. Keeping the anchor text natural and spreading the backlinks out over time seems to make the strategy more sustainable.
 
Branded anchors have worked better for me than forcing exact match anchors. A few strong placements can help when a page gets stuck.
 
I've had the same experience. Google punishes a page when with many keyword-rich anchors
 
It's an interesting test , but I'd be careful about treating it as proof of a hard anchor density threshold. Cutting back on aggressive exact match anchors and adding more branded placements can make the anchor profile look less aggressive , but that doesn't mean anchor dilution was the only thing driving the change. The rank jump could easily be a mix of the new placements , indexing time and the anchor changes rather than one isolated factor. If those keywords are now sitting in the teens , I'd test some relevant contextual internal links from supporting pages before building more commercial anchors
 
OnlineProxy said:
It's an interesting test , but I'd be careful about treating it as proof of a hard anchor density threshold. Cutting back on aggressive exact match anchors and adding more branded placements can make the anchor profile look less aggressive , but that doesn't mean anchor dilution was the only thing driving the change. The rank jump could easily be a mix of the new placements , indexing time and the anchor changes rather than one isolated factor. If those keywords are now sitting in the teens , I'd test some relevant contextual internal links from supporting pages before building more commercial anchors
Click to expand...
That's a fair point though. I wouldn't treat anchor change as sole reason either new placements, indexing time, and overall link context likely plays part. And the internal link test was good at next step before adding more commercial anchors.
 
GSERP said:
Hi BHW folks,

I just wanna share a quick test that I ran with brand anchors and authority placements on my sample site.

I had afew keywords stuck around the 40-50 range, so I reduced exact-match anchors and used more branded ones instead. And added few authority placements over couple of weeks and left the rest of the site unchanged. After it got indexed, some kywds moved into the 20s, with a few reaching the 10–20 range. I tracked them for several weeks and most gains held, although there were normal fluctuations. Not calling this a proven formula from one test. Just sharing the result becoz those movemnt got interesting.

Anyone else tested a similar anchor mix?
Click to expand...

One thing I would add is a control, do not touch few similar keywords during the same period. If they moved too, it was probably an update or normal fluctuation, not the anchors.

Also "branded" can mean a few things. pure brand, naked URL and brand+keyword hybrids don't always act the same. I find hybrids carry more relevancey. how was your split, and how many links did you add?
 
Branded anchors can definitely be useful when a keyword gets stuck, but the placement quality matters just as much as the anchor mix. You can combine branded, URL, and a few relevant keyword variations while building links consistently from relevant sites.
 
GSERP said:
Hi BHW folks,

I just wanna share a quick test that I ran with brand anchors and authority placements on my sample site.

I had afew keywords stuck around the 40-50 range, so I reduced exact-match anchors and used more branded ones instead. And added few authority placements over couple of weeks and left the rest of the site unchanged. After it got indexed, some kywds moved into the 20s, with a few reaching the 10–20 range. I tracked them for several weeks and most gains held, although there were normal fluctuations. Not calling this a proven formula from one test. Just sharing the result becoz those movemnt got interesting.

Anyone else tested a similar anchor mix?
Click to expand...
the fact that u have altered very little gives this experiment more validity than those tests in which everything was altered at once.i wonder whether branded anchors would work just as well on old articles that had been staggnant for months?
 
GSERP said:
Hi BHW folks,

I just wanna share a quick test that I ran with brand anchors and authority placements on my sample site.

I had afew keywords stuck around the 40-50 range, so I reduced exact-match anchors and used more branded ones instead. And added few authority placements over couple of weeks and left the rest of the site unchanged. After it got indexed, some kywds moved into the 20s, with a few reaching the 10–20 range. I tracked them for several weeks and most gains held, although there were normal fluctuations. Not calling this a proven formula from one test. Just sharing the result becoz those movemnt got interesting.

Anyone else tested a similar anchor mix?
Click to expand...
It is typical to use brand keywords in combination with high domain authority content in order to rank for difficult KWs. It is because google penalises exact match keyword anchoring too mch nowadays that the dilution of the anchor profile enables ur site relevance to start working.
 
Interesting test!

I've also found that a balanced anchor profile with more branded and natural anchors can support sustainable ranking improvements.

Combining niche relevant authority placements with consistent link quality seems to work better than overusing exact match anchors.
 
did you notice the same movement on pages with fewer backlinks too? that would be interesting to compare.
 
Titans said:
Branded anchors can definitely be useful when a keyword gets stuck, but the placement quality matters just as much as the anchor mix. You can combine branded, URL, and a few relevant keyword variations while building links consistently from relevant sites.
Click to expand...
Agree. I wouldn't rely on anchor mix alone, as placement relevance, page context and toverall backlink profile play role. Branded and URL anchors aworth keeping in the mix, but approach shld depend on pge and its existing link profile.
whimsyink said:
the fact that u have altered very little gives this experiment more validity than those tests in which everything was altered at once.i wonder whether branded anchors would work just as well on old articles that had been staggnant for months?
Click to expand...
That's worth testing on older pages too. try it on a few stagnant articles and track whether the movement holds after adjusting the anchor mix.
wertos said:
It is typical to use brand keywords in combination with high domain authority content in order to rank for difficult KWs. It is because google penalises exact match keyword anchoring too mch nowadays that the dilution of the anchor profile enables ur site relevance to start working.
Click to expand...
I wouldn't say exact-match anchors automatically trigger penalties, but an overly aggressive pattern look unnatural.Mix of branded, URL and relevant keyword variations makes more sense.
WickednDivine said:
Interesting test!

I've also found that a balanced anchor profile with more branded and natural anchors can support sustainable ranking improvements.

Combining niche relevant authority placements with consistent link quality seems to work better than overusing exact match anchors.
Click to expand...
Exactly. Relevance as important as authority, and high DR link from unrelated page isn't always valuable. Contextual placements within niche are what I'd prioritize.
VyroClicks said:
did you notice the same movement on pages with fewer backlinks too? that would be interesting to compare.
Click to expand...
I haven't isolated that part yet, but it's definitely worth comparing. Testing pages with fewer backlinks against stronger pages shows whether same movement happens.
 
Also see if the better rankings bring more clicks. Higher positions don't always mean more traffic.
 
GSERP said:
Hi BHW folks,

I just wanna share a quick test that I ran with brand anchors and authority placements on my sample site.

I had afew keywords stuck around the 40-50 range, so I reduced exact-match anchors and used more branded ones instead. And added few authority placements over couple of weeks and left the rest of the site unchanged. After it got indexed, some kywds moved into the 20s, with a few reaching the 10–20 range. I tracked them for several weeks and most gains held, although there were normal fluctuations. Not calling this a proven formula from one test. Just sharing the result becoz those movemnt got interesting.

Anyone else tested a similar anchor mix?
Click to expand...
Fun test! I also think that natural anchor text is crucial for SEO in the long run.

The combination of branded anchor texts along with relevant, high-quality authoritative links may help build a better backlink profile.

It will be very interesting to see the results over time.
 
littlepuzzle said:
Also see if the better rankings bring more clicks. Higher positions don't always mean more traffic.
Click to expand...
Yeap. also tracking GSC clicks and impressions alongside rankings, as a position jump only useful if it brings relevant traffic.
SEO Sparton said:
Fun test! I also think that natural anchor text is crucial for SEO in the long run.

The combination of branded anchor texts along with relevant, high-quality authoritative links may help build a better backlink profile.

It will be very interesting to see the results over time.
Click to expand...
Exactly. founded branded anchors work well as part of balanced anchor profile, especially when placements are genuinely relevant. The key is keeping link profile natural rather than forcing keyword anchors.
 
Good observation. I have seen exact match anchors become less effective when the supporting pages lack topical relevance. A stronger mix of branded anchors and contextually relevant authority links is a more sensible approach than trying to force rankings through anchor ratio alone
 
Advertise on BHW
You must log in or register to reply here.
Sign up now!

Main Menu

Home Main Forum List Black Hat SEO White Hat SEO BHW Newbie Guide Blogging Black Hat Tools Social Media Downloads

Marketplace

Account Selling Content / Copywriting EBooks / Methods Hosting Misc Proxies For Sale SEO - Link building SEO - Packages Social Media Social Media - Panels Web Design More

Making Money

Affiliate Programs Hire a Freelancer IM Journeys Making Money Pay Per Click Site Flipping Want to Buy

BlackHat World

Dispute Resolution Forum Suggestions & Feedback Introductions Lounge
Back
Top