✦ Ranking Guaranteed with ONE SELLER STRATEGY ✦ Real Authority GNews Guest Posts ✦ DA80+ ✦ DR80+ ✦ 200K+ Real Traffic ✦ From $29.9 ⌯⌲ Flat 60% Off!
- Thread starter mangoodi
- Start date
- Nov 30, 2016
- 1,662
- 292
Details Shared! Check PM!
Place your trust in us and order today. Your success is our top priority!
Place your trust in us and order today. Your success is our top priority!
alexnobmmo
Regular Member
- Jul 4, 2014
- 243
- 34
Hi, I'm interested in plan C and D
For plan C, can send me the sample of sites (US traffic)
For plan D, can you specify the cost & duration? (it's the guaranteed ranking, right?)
My niche: clean, business & finance (not anything sensitive, illegal)
Thanks
For plan C, can send me the sample of sites (US traffic)
For plan D, can you specify the cost & duration? (it's the guaranteed ranking, right?)
My niche: clean, business & finance (not anything sensitive, illegal)
Thanks
- Nov 30, 2016
- 1,662
- 292
Details Shared! Check PM!
Place your trust in us and order today. Your success is our top priority!
Place your trust in us and order today. Your success is our top priority!
qmffordnr431
Newbie
- Dec 4, 2025
- 15
- 5
Would it be effective in Korea, too?
- Nov 30, 2016
- 1,662
- 292
- Nov 30, 2016
- 1,662
- 292
Details Shared! Check PM!
Place your trust in us and order today. Your success is our top priority!
Place your trust in us and order today. Your success is our top priority!
- Nov 30, 2016
- 1,662
- 292
Details Shared! Check PM!
Place your trust in us and order today. Your success is our top priority!
Place your trust in us and order today. Your success is our top priority!
SuperSoaker
Newbie
- Apr 15, 2025
- 11
- 1
BE CAREFUL WITH THIS SELLER!
In my experience, the service delivered has fallen well below the quality promised and does not justify the price charged. (250 euros)
The backlink placements I reviewed were poorly matched to our niche, awkwardly inserted into unrelated content, and one advertised placement wasn’t even a clickable link when checked. This raises serious concerns about both the quality of the service and the sales approach.
I’m currently trying to resolve this directly with the seller. I’ll update this review based on how they handle the complaint and can provide documented examples supporting these concerns.
Every single link follows the same low-quality pattern, on top of the other mistakes already identified in the work delivered.
I’ll attach screenshot below showing real reported metrics so others can assess the quality for themselves.
€250 backlink package review - poor relevance and basic quality issues
I reviewed our package of 10 backlink placements for a gaming-related page. Publisher names and the target keyword are redacted below.
1. [Publisher redacted] — Limited value
The site’s gaming/emulation focus provides some relevance, but the link to our target page is inserted into a paragraph about an unrelated spy/action game. The surrounding content provides little reason to reference our page.
2. [Publisher redacted] — Limited value
PC gaming software is reasonably adjacent to our niche. However, the article discusses remote desktop access and cosmetic-store tracking in a different game, leaving the connection to our page weak.
3. [Publisher redacted] — Weak
Gaming branding helps, but the site also publishes unrelated homepage content. The article includes essay-writing links, while our backlink is inserted into a generic unrelated RPG paragraph.
4. [Publisher redacted] — Weak
The article discusses actual multiplayer games, but the publisher covers many unrelated subjects. Our link appears in a section about a completely different social-deduction game.
5. [Publisher redacted] — Very weak
The article concerns an unrelated dark-fantasy RPG. A broadly similar theme provides little relevance to our specific target. The site also openly offers guest-post and content-placement services.
6. [Publisher redacted] — Very weak
A celebrity-focused publisher hosting a free/casual gaming article. There is little to none overlap with our target game or its audience, and the inserted link lacks a convincing contextual connection.
7. [Publisher redacted] — Very weak
The article discusses multiplayer gaming, but the publisher identifies itself as an education/language-learning platform. Unrelated gambling anchors further weaken confidence in the placement quality.
8. [Publisher redacted] — Very weak
Generic gaming commentary on a broad general-content site. Awkward gambling links appear alongside our placement, which also reads like an unrelated insertion.
9. [Publisher redacted] — Very weak
A broad technology/money-making blog hosting basic gaming content. Gambling-related anchors and the weak connection to our target provide little editorial confidence.
10. [Publisher redacted] — No backlink when checked
The target keyword appears as plain text, without a hyperlink to our website. At the time of checking, this placement did not contain the advertised backlink.
My assessment
In my opinion, this package does not justify €250 in its current form. Across the nine actual backlinks, the same target keyword is repeatedly inserted into passages that barely relate to our page.
In my experience, the service delivered has fallen well below the quality promised and does not justify the price charged. (250 euros)
The backlink placements I reviewed were poorly matched to our niche, awkwardly inserted into unrelated content, and one advertised placement wasn’t even a clickable link when checked. This raises serious concerns about both the quality of the service and the sales approach.
I’m currently trying to resolve this directly with the seller. I’ll update this review based on how they handle the complaint and can provide documented examples supporting these concerns.
Every single link follows the same low-quality pattern, on top of the other mistakes already identified in the work delivered.
I’ll attach screenshot below showing real reported metrics so others can assess the quality for themselves.
€250 backlink package review - poor relevance and basic quality issues
I reviewed our package of 10 backlink placements for a gaming-related page. Publisher names and the target keyword are redacted below.
1. [Publisher redacted] — Limited value
The site’s gaming/emulation focus provides some relevance, but the link to our target page is inserted into a paragraph about an unrelated spy/action game. The surrounding content provides little reason to reference our page.
2. [Publisher redacted] — Limited value
PC gaming software is reasonably adjacent to our niche. However, the article discusses remote desktop access and cosmetic-store tracking in a different game, leaving the connection to our page weak.
3. [Publisher redacted] — Weak
Gaming branding helps, but the site also publishes unrelated homepage content. The article includes essay-writing links, while our backlink is inserted into a generic unrelated RPG paragraph.
4. [Publisher redacted] — Weak
The article discusses actual multiplayer games, but the publisher covers many unrelated subjects. Our link appears in a section about a completely different social-deduction game.
5. [Publisher redacted] — Very weak
The article concerns an unrelated dark-fantasy RPG. A broadly similar theme provides little relevance to our specific target. The site also openly offers guest-post and content-placement services.
6. [Publisher redacted] — Very weak
A celebrity-focused publisher hosting a free/casual gaming article. There is little to none overlap with our target game or its audience, and the inserted link lacks a convincing contextual connection.
7. [Publisher redacted] — Very weak
The article discusses multiplayer gaming, but the publisher identifies itself as an education/language-learning platform. Unrelated gambling anchors further weaken confidence in the placement quality.
8. [Publisher redacted] — Very weak
Generic gaming commentary on a broad general-content site. Awkward gambling links appear alongside our placement, which also reads like an unrelated insertion.
9. [Publisher redacted] — Very weak
A broad technology/money-making blog hosting basic gaming content. Gambling-related anchors and the weak connection to our target provide little editorial confidence.
10. [Publisher redacted] — No backlink when checked
The target keyword appears as plain text, without a hyperlink to our website. At the time of checking, this placement did not contain the advertised backlink.
My assessment
In my opinion, this package does not justify €250 in its current form. Across the nine actual backlinks, the same target keyword is repeatedly inserted into passages that barely relate to our page.
