Same here, Claude can be pretty strict sometimes.
there are too many options like chatgpt codex, and google antigravity but cluade is also a good choice anyway in your case is not working.
Yeah, right. 5.5 just goes to the web service terms, reads them, and acts accordingly
Yeah, right. 5.5 just goes to the web service terms, reads them, and acts accordingly
DeepSeek is the winner/best for me! +1!
switching tools helps less than changing how you ask. most refusals come from the task
I'm also interested in AI tools for coding. One thing I would look for is support for custom API endpoints and different model providers, so users can choose the setup that works best for their needs.
My recommendation is to create a multi-agent system; you can find thousands of repositories on GitHub that facilitate this. How does it help? Essentially, depending on the task at hand, you select the AI engine best suited for it. This offers two main benefits: 1. You won’t burn through your Claude tokens in just an hour. 2. You gain efficiency, as models like Google’s new "Agros" (or similar offerings) and DeepSeek’s models excel in their respective domains. While it’s well-known that Claude is vastly superior for coding, Google’s engines are far better for search and data extraction—exactly what you need—thanks to the "common sense" derived from their massive training dataset (since they essentially own most of the internet).
