AEO and GEO

Yangster · 2026-10-12T12:11:16+0100

Does anyone have a tool that reliably measures the citations / share of voice for a brand and is affordable?

Been trying a few, but once you want it to track say 30-40 prompts and the fan-out queries then you are into a few $100 a month.

Help and suggestions would be appreciated

GANDUSARKAR · 2026-10-12T12:13:25+0100

i am also interested in finding an affordable option for this tracking 30 40 prompts can get expensive quickly so it would be useful to know if anyone has tried a tool that gives reliable citation data without the high monthly cost.

Mr.Dollar · 2026-10-12T13:06:38+0100

The price climbs because the tools re-run every prompt several times across engines, and those repeat runs are the part you actually need. One run of a prompt is noise, the cited sources change between runs. If budget is the problem, do it yourself for the 30 to 40 prompts.
Run each a few times through the API, log which domains get cited, and track citation share per prompt over time, not one blended score. Fan out queries you can add by hand for your main prompts only. Not hard to script

WickednDivine · 2026-10-12T13:17:38+0100

I’d suggest trying a combination of manual prompt tracking and a lightweight spreadsheet to monitor brand mentions, citations and competitor visibility.

Most tools get expensive at scale, so test smaller batches first and focus on consistent tracking before paying for a full platform.

qmffordnr431 · 2026-10-13T01:23:10+0100

The cost is indeed quite steep...

ShakeelLinks · 2026-10-13T08:30:07+0100

Yangster said:
Does anyone have a tool that reliably measures the citations / share of voice for a brand and is affordable?

Been trying a few, but once you want it to track say 30-40 prompts and the fan-out queries then you are into a few $100 a month.

Help and suggestions would be appreciated

Have you tried Rankscale? It looks like a relatively affordable option for tracking AI citations and visibility. Also, curious if anyone has tested how accurate these tools are compared to manually checking the same prompts.

parekis · 2026-10-13T08:43:56+0100

GANDUSARKAR said:
i am also interested in finding an affordable option for this tracking 30 40 prompts can get expensive quickly so it would be useful to know if anyone has tried a tool that gives reliable citation data without the high monthly cost.

Tracing 30 to 40 prompts certainly adds up, particularly when considering citations on various AI tools. It would be better to begin with fewer high-intent prompts and compare the information with manual review before investing in an expensive solution.

PyMaster · 2026-10-13T09:13:01+0100

Yangster said:
Does anyone have a tool that reliably measures the citations / share of voice for a brand and is affordable?

Been trying a few, but once you want it to track say 30-40 prompts and the fan-out queries then you are into a few $100 a month.

Help and suggestions would be appreciated

the truth is, once you start tracking additional keywords, things will become vry costly quite soon. My advice would be to use an Excel table initially and track those keywords manually at least once or twice a week. compare them nd identify the brands along with their origin based on the searche . It takes more effort, but you won’t have to pay a few hundred dollars monthly.

luckyman · 2026-10-13T11:35:18+0100

hello

Yangster said:
Does anyone have a tool that reliably measures the citations / share of voice for a brand and is affordable?

Been trying a few, but once you want it to track say 30-40 prompts and the fan-out queries then you are into a few $100 a month.

Help and suggestions would be appreciated

Plz give a look to this tool.

Mentionable (dot) AI

Thanks

AEO and GEO

Yangster

Registered Member

GANDUSARKAR

Newbie

Mr.Dollar

Registered Member

WickednDivine

Elite Member

qmffordnr431

Newbie

ShakeelLinks

Newbie

parekis

Registered Member

PyMaster

Newbie

luckyman

Elite Member

Main Menu

Marketplace

Making Money

BlackHat World