After a guest post goes live, what technical checks do you actually do?

Sarah Mathews

Supreme Member
Jr. VIP
Joined
Sep 1, 2009
Messages
1,305
Reaction score
355
One thing, after a guest post goes live, I usually check that the backlink is live, clickable, and points to the correct url.
I also check the html, rel attributes, redirects, and basic crawlability.

Just asking what technical checks others do before considering a backlink properly delivered?
 
One thing, after a guest post goes live, I usually check that the backlink is live, clickable, and points to the correct url.
I also check the html, rel attributes, redirects, and basic crawlability.

Just asking what technical checks others do before considering a backlink properly delivered?
As of me , i add one more checks as page isn't accidentally carrying noindex or being blocked by robot.txt. and worthy enough to check final url after redirects becoz links look fine but it drag to somewhere unexpected.
 
One thing, after a guest post goes live, I usually check that the backlink is live, clickable, and points to the correct url.
I also check the html, rel attributes, redirects, and basic crawlability.

Just asking what technical checks others do before considering a backlink properly delivered?
I tend to go through the same routine i will test the link to ensure that it works and leads to the proper URL without being interrupted by any odd redirects or attributes i would also want to ensure that the page is crawlable it is nothing fancy but it is all too easy to overlook one of these things.
 
I usually click the link check the source and make sure theres no redirect or weird rel tag. Then a quick index check and I’m done.
 
I would also confirm the page can be indexed the link is not being blocked by robots or script and that the target URL is working with no extra redirects the link should not be in any template area but naturally in the content.
 
Apart from checking the link and its rel attributes, you can also check whether the page is indexed, has a 200 status code, and isn't blocked by robots.txt or a noindex tag. Make sure the link points to the correct URL without unexpected redirects. I also recommend checking whether the article has internal links, as they can help Google discover and crawl the page.
 
The most useful check, in my opinion, is a week or two later: look at referral traffic, indexing, and whether the guest post is actually getting impressions/clicks. A technically perfect backlink that sends zero relevant visitors isn't necessarily accomplishing much.
 
Mostly basic things.
Check if the images work.
Check if the internlink + external link work (I don´t click them).
Check if the title fonts are showing correctly (correct size).

Then I just leave it as it is...
 
I usually check the link is live and clickable first then make sure the URL is correct. After that I look at the rel tags, redirects and if the page is actually crawlable. I’d also check the page source once just to make sure the link isnt doing anything weird.
 
i just check the link is properly placed and anchor is correct then wait for the page to get indexed
 
One thing, after a guest post goes live, I usually check that the backlink is live, clickable, and points to the correct url.
I also check the html, rel attributes, redirects, and basic crawlability.

Just asking what technical checks others do before considering a backlink properly delivered?
I would also make sure that the page was indexed, that the link was contextual, that the anchor was natural and that there were no strange issues with canonical or noindex.

In my mind, the backlink is delivered properly only if the link and the page are healthy technically.
 
One thing, after a guest post goes live, I usually check that the backlink is live, clickable, and points to the correct url.
I also check the html, rel attributes, redirects, and basic crawlability.

Just asking what technical checks others do before considering a backlink properly delivered?
honesty, I first check the indexing, canonical, robots, and anchor positioning. I will also look into the source code to find out whether there is anything weird in the link in terms of rel or redirect attribute.
then, if all is fine, then I won't do anything further and just wait for the page to index. there is no need to check the link every day thereafter.
 
I would also confirm the page can be indexed the link is not being blocked by robots or script and that the target URL is working with no extra redirects the link should not be in any template area but naturally in the content.
Yeah, I'd check the technical aspect as well. Having a clean URL without a redirect chain with a natural placement in the body of the content is far more preferable than a sitewide/template link.
 
What comes to mind first is content quality; then what I check is anchor text and backlink. Next, I check is the page indexed and is the link followable. If I can, I'd also request to put some authority relevant links into the content itself, and add internal links to related pages on the site. Those small things makes the placement more natural and useful.
 
I usually verify the link is live, ******** as agreed, points to the correct URL and isn’t being redirected or blocked from crawling. I also quickly check the page source, HTTP status, indexability and placement to make sure everything is technically clean.
 
One thing, after a guest post goes live, I usually check that the backlink is live, clickable, and points to the correct url.
I also check the html, rel attributes, redirects, and basic crawlability.

Just asking what technical checks others do before considering a backlink properly delivered?
I usually check for the live link clickable, target URL, anchor text, rel attributes, 200 status, canonical URL. That's generally enough to confirm the links was properly delivered.
 
Back
Top