donbosscapo
Newbie
- Mar 11, 2023
- 13
- 0
seems like there are a lot more of them lately.
I see you are observing lots of channels lately with faceless content but if it add the value and is in demand so why is there a problem in it. It's the basic rule of business: Demand and supply.seems like there are a lot more of them lately.
tbh, they were totally flooded with generic ai garbage but if u make the effort to write quality scripts and edit them, you can definitely claim your piece of the pie.seems like there are a lot more of them lately.
Honestly, those low effort AI generated sites are pretty dead at the moment, but the algorithm only ignores them when their creators arent trying new hooks and landers.seems like there are a lot more of them lately.
It's correct and it is because nowadays faceless channels are easy to manage and generate revenue from them faster for creators so they all started creating but now almost everyone is creating same type of content.seems like there are a lot more of them lately.
crowded yesh but that does not mean it is all bad either. more filmmakkers means more competition but also more evidence of how well the system works. i would be more concerned about having a unique approach rather than anonymity, which could make me recognizable after a couple of viewings.seems like there are a lot more of them lately.
tbh it feels crowded until you look at the retention and repeat viewership numbers, since most channels seem interchangeable once the thumbnails are stripped awayseems like there are a lot more of them lately.
It was definitely crowded but, in my opinion, saturation is not the actual problem here it is the recycled content and similar thumbnails that make channels invisible.seems like there are a lot more of them lately.