sure does feel that way these days. sometimes a post u think will do great just fails while a seemingly insiggnificant one goes viral all of a sudden. i guess that the first few engagements do count but there is always an element of chance involved too.one post can get decent impressions and the next one barely moves even with a similar topic. anyone else seeing this?
Totally man most of the time it just seems totally random. It appears that early commenting on others posts is much more likely to grabs the initial algorithm than actual gud content itself.one post can get decent impressions and the next one barely moves even with a similar topic. anyone else seeing this?
yeah totally agrees linkedIn can be quite fickle when it comes to distribution, despites how similar the content may appear. honestly first hour engagement appears to be importantone post can get decent impressions and the next one barely moves even with a similar topic. anyone else seeing this?
Yeah sometimes it feels like the algorithm is promoting content erratically. Did you post in the same time frame though?one post can get decent impressions and the next one barely moves even with a similar topic. anyone else seeing this?
Yess I am seeing that too. It takes tiny changes in the hook or initial comments to affect the reach significantly. That is why I judge a post by several results.one post can get decent impressions and the next one barely moves even with a similar topic. anyone else seeing this?