mitchil.owan
Newbie
- Jul 2, 2026
- 6
- 4
I have started moving past counting traffic and considering the engagement rates and conversion rate and quality of the traffic sources before anything else. Just curious about what other people consider.
I also measure the bounce rate, tym on page and assisted conversion rates sometimes low volume sources delivered mch better quality users than high traffic sources.I have started moving past counting traffic and considering the engagement rates and conversion rate and quality of the traffic sources before anything else. Just curious about what other people consider.
i have started seeing it from that perspective as well. it is easy to see high traffic figures on paper but it means nothing if they are not engaging or doing anything else for that matter. the source, their intent nd their actions are much more important than their mere pressence.I have started moving past counting traffic and considering the engagement rates and conversion rate and quality of the traffic sources before anything else. Just curious about what other people consider.
Absolutely. Traffic from hitwise. is useless if it's all just fake. clicks coming from irrelevant countries.This is where traffic source and backlink analysis really speak volumes.I agree. Traffic volume alone doesn't tell you much. I usually look at engagement, traffic sources, relevance, and whether the traffic actually has value for the site before considering a link.
truthfully, I’m actually more concerned about where the traffic is coming from rather than the stats themselves. random traffic may show impressive stats in the tool but if the traffic is not relevant, I usually pass.I have started moving past counting traffic and considering the engagement rates and conversion rate and quality of the traffic sources before anything else. Just curious about what other people consider.
I usually check niche relevance, traffic quality, and whether the site has a genuine audience before deciding if a backlink is worth it because site might have good traffic on paper, but if the audience arent relevantI have started moving past counting traffic and considering the engagement rates and conversion rate and quality of the traffic sources before anything else. Just curious about what other people consider.
Yeah, raw traffic figures may be very deceptive. I would take into account the source, intention, geography, and engagement as well; 10,000 targeted visitors can be much more valuable than 50,000 generic clicks.The source of the traffic matters too, since two sites can have similar visitor numbers but very different audiences.
You are right.I have started moving past counting traffic and considering the engagement rates and conversion rate and quality of the traffic sources before anything else. Just curious about what other people consider.