Can old low-value pages may affect site recovery ?

GSERP · Friday at 10:56 AM

As client site that has been struggling to recover after a significant drop in organic traffic. It’s an older site and has accumulated a lot of pages over the years. While going deeper into the site, I found a few pages with very little traffic, thin content, outdated information, and basically no search value. I’ve already improved some of major pages and cleaned up several obvious issues, but this recovery is moving slower than expected.

will this cause of recovery? Any thoughts folks?

suzaneia · Friday at 11:17 AM

GSERP said:
As client site that has been struggling to recover after a significant drop in organic traffic. It’s an older site and has accumulated a lot of pages over the years. While going deeper into the site, I found a few pages with very little traffic, thin content, outdated information, and basically no search value. I’ve already improved some of major pages and cleaned up several obvious issues, but this recovery is moving slower than expected.

will this cause of recovery? Any thoughts folks?

google may also have a problem with site bloat since bad-quality page may influence google is signals of site quality. eliminate the extra page through 410 or noindex nd wait for the search engine crawler to update the information.

TrackBid · Friday at 12:20 PM

If the main pages are already improved, give the changes some time before making more big changes.

Frank Morton · Friday at 12:50 PM

GSERP said:
As client site that has been struggling to recover after a significant drop in organic traffic. It’s an older site and has accumulated a lot of pages over the years. While going deeper into the site, I found a few pages with very little traffic, thin content, outdated information, and basically no search value. I’ve already improved some of major pages and cleaned up several obvious issues, but this recovery is moving slower than expected.

will this cause of recovery? Any thoughts folks?

Yes, old low-value pages can be part of the problem, but I wouldn't assume they are the reason the site hasn't recovered.

TrafficSaviour · Friday at 2:15 PM

GSERP said:
As client site that has been struggling to recover after a significant drop in organic traffic. It’s an older site and has accumulated a lot of pages over the years. While going deeper into the site, I found a few pages with very little traffic, thin content, outdated information, and basically no search value. I’ve already improved some of major pages and cleaned up several obvious issues, but this recovery is moving slower than expected.

will this cause of recovery? Any thoughts folks?

yesh older pages with lower value certainly do play a role in this particularly if u have many of these pages around.but do not go around removing pages just bcuz they have low traffic for that reason alone.i would look at each individual page to see if it does have any links, impressions or any function within the site nd proceed from there accordinglly.

MadOnGrind · Friday at 4:48 PM

The thing that caught me out on a cleanup like this was assuming low traffic meant low value. I pruned a batch of flat pages on an older site once and two of them turned out to be the only URLs anything external was pointing at. Undoing that took longer than the cleanup did.

So before removing anything now I split the weak pages into two piles from the GSC pages report (pull twelve months, not three, or the seasonal stuff hides). Pile one is zero impressions, genuinely nothing. Pile two is impressions but barely any clicks, and that pile usually isn't a pruning job at all. It's titles, or the page answering a different intent than the query it's showing for.

On the pace of it. Even when the cleanup is right, an old site with a lot of URLs gets recrawled slowly, and you get no signal back until enough of them have been revisited. "Slower than expected" on its own doesn't tell you the diagnosis was wrong yet.

Rough page count, out of curiosity? And was the drop a cliff on a date you can point at, or more of a slow bleed? Those two tend to have different causes and it changes what I'd look at next.

Isaaciya · Monday at 11:46 AM

GSERP said:
As client site that has been struggling to recover after a significant drop in organic traffic. It’s an older site and has accumulated a lot of pages over the years. While going deeper into the site, I found a few pages with very little traffic, thin content, outdated information, and basically no search value. I’ve already improved some of major pages and cleaned up several obvious issues, but this recovery is moving slower than expected.

will this cause of recovery? Any thoughts folks?

however, low imo traffic cannot guarantee that the page dies I would first look into impressions and backlinks, for some of these page may still be useful in some way or another.

Larry Scott · Monday at 11:54 AM

Yes, they certainly weigh down the entire site. Google now evaluates overall domain quality, so hundreds of thin, outdated pages signal to the algorithm that the site is low value, which can suppress the performance of your stronger pages.

GSERP · Monday at 12:19 PM

MadOnGrind said:
The thing that caught me out on a cleanup like this was assuming low traffic meant low value. I pruned a batch of flat pages on an older site once and two of them turned out to be the only URLs anything external was pointing at. Undoing that took longer than the cleanup did.

So before removing anything now I split the weak pages into two piles from the GSC pages report (pull twelve months, not three, or the seasonal stuff hides). Pile one is zero impressions, genuinely nothing. Pile two is impressions but barely any clicks, and that pile usually isn't a pruning job at all. It's titles, or the page answering a different intent than the query it's showing for.

On the pace of it. Even when the cleanup is right, an old site with a lot of URLs gets recrawled slowly, and you get no signal back until enough of them have been revisited. "Slower than expected" on its own doesn't tell you the diagnosis was wrong yet.

Rough page count, out of curiosity? And was the drop a cliff on a date you can point at, or more of a slow bleed? Those two tend to have different causes and it changes what I'd look at next.

That makes sense. Low traffic alone isn’t enough to justify pruning. Yeah, I’d check GSC impressions, backlinks, and search intent first, then refresh or consolidate where possible. Still the site has lot of older URLs, that also slows down. google needs time to recrawl the site and reassess the changes.

kimiko Lagent · Monday at 12:22 PM

GSERP said:
As client site that has been struggling to recover after a significant drop in organic traffic. It’s an older site and has accumulated a lot of pages over the years. While going deeper into the site, I found a few pages with very little traffic, thin content, outdated information, and basically no search value. I’ve already improved some of major pages and cleaned up several obvious issues, but this recovery is moving slower than expected.

will this cause of recovery? Any thoughts folks?

There is value to revisiting low quality pages particularly where there are many thin and/or outdated pages on the website however
i would not automatically assume that they are the sole cause of the slow recovery as there could also be factors relating to the indexing process and/or timing of the drop.

Sarah Mathews · Monday at 12:57 PM

GSERP said:
As client site that has been struggling to recover after a significant drop in organic traffic. It’s an older site and has accumulated a lot of pages over the years. While going deeper into the site, I found a few pages with very little traffic, thin content, outdated information, and basically no search value. I’ve already improved some of major pages and cleaned up several obvious issues, but this recovery is moving slower than expected.

will this cause of recovery? Any thoughts folks?

It can be a factor, but I would check the overall quality and purpose of the pages first. If a page has little value or search potential, then it may make sense to remove or consolidate it.

Can old low-value pages may affect site recovery ?

GSERP

Supreme Member

suzaneia

Newbie

TrackBid

Newbie

Frank Morton

Newbie

TrafficSaviour

Junior Member

MadOnGrind

Junior Member

Isaaciya

Newbie

Larry Scott

Regular Member

GSERP

Supreme Member

kimiko Lagent

Newbie

Sarah Mathews

Supreme Member

Main Menu

Marketplace

Making Money

BlackHat World