Experience with Ai content + Huminazers = good seo articles

mraffiliates · Monday at 5:27 PM

We are looking at using ai tools to re-write articles with ai and then running them through a huminazer, what are your experiences with this?, did you manage to rank your website with this type of content "that also passas Ai detection tools" ?

Any insights or input?

thanks

HustleTong · Monday at 5:31 PM

You have to edit the whole thing at the end
Keep it straight to the point as much as possible

mraffiliates · Monday at 5:40 PM

HustleTong said:
You have to edit the whole thing at the end
Keep it straight to the point as much as possible

But wouldent it be fine if it reads well and passes Ai content detectors?

jeffro89 · Monday at 5:53 PM

mraffiliates said:
But wouldent it be fine if it reads well and passes Ai content detectors?

Yo, you need to leave AI content detectors. Normal content written by a human can also pass as AI content. So you really are wasting your time. The only thing you should worry about is watermaking from LLMs.

To bypass content watermarking that is used with Openai, Gemini, Claude. Just paste your content into a chinese LLM. Deepseek etc. Then get a human to proof read it.

Stop flapping like a fish worrying about nonsense. Your good to go.

MoMarketing · Monday at 5:57 PM

I would not use some humanizers editing takes some time but worth the effort and you can make the content according to your preferences and knowledge of SEO which humanizers can't make it.

The problem I see with these AI tools are it dont speak like human use long words heavy sentences which are hard to read

Cheers,
MoMarketing

mraffiliates · Monday at 5:59 PM

jeffro89 said:
Yo, you need to leave AI content detectors. Normal content written by a human can also pass as AI content. So you really are wasting your time. The only thing you should worry about is watermaking from LLMs.

To bypass content watermarking that is used with Openai, Gemini, Claude. Just paste your content into a chinese LLM. Deepseek etc. Then get a human to proof read it.

Stop flapping like a fish worrying about nonsense. Your good to go.

Okay your losing me here, so lets break it down, yes of course human written content will pass Ai detectors, its written by a human, not Ai?, and deepseek is also a Ai content creator, no?, so your point is basically that by exchanging ex: claude or Openai with Deepseek, i would bypass the LLMs, but that still brings me back to Ai, no matter claude, Openai or Deepseek + humanizer= good seo content

Dont get your "flapping like a fish metaphor, but a nice one tho for sure =), thanks for your input

MeninaJohn · Monday at 6:17 PM

I wouldn't care about passing AI detectors. Better to spend that time adding real examples and useful info that isn't already in every competing article.

dvc · Monday at 6:31 PM

Detectors are a thing from the past. Now we have AI signatures. And you can't escape from it.

On the other side, google doesnt care either.

Not sure what the tools that offers a "humanize" feature can help with. Your llm can do it directly.

spaciousabhi · Monday at 6:58 PM

i'd honestly test whether the humanizer is doing anything useful at all.

make 3 small batches... ai only, ai + humanizer and ai + proper manual editing. keep the topics/sites similar and compare indexing, impressions, positions and clicks after 60-90 days.

if the humanized batch performs exactly like the normal ai batch then you're basically paying just to get a nicer detector score.

i'd care way more about what actually ranks than whether some detector says 5% or 95% ai.

app_pilot · Tuesday at 4:26 AM

mraffiliates said:
We are looking at using ai tools to re-write articles with ai and then running them through a huminazer, what are your experiences with this?, did you manage to rank your website with this type of content "that also passas Ai detection tools" ?

Any insights or input?

thanks

AI rewriting and humanizers work for quick traffic, but search engines eventually catch low-effort. adding real manual edits will keep sites ranking.

app_pilot · Tuesday at 4:27 AM

mraffiliates said:
We are looking at using ai tools to re-write articles with ai and then running them through a huminazer, what are your experiences with this?, did you manage to rank your website with this type of content "that also passas Ai detection tools" ?

Any insights or input?

thanks

AI rewriting and humanizers work for quick traffic, but search engines eventually catch low-effort. adding real manual edits will keeps sites ranking.

app_pilot · Tuesday at 4:29 AM

mraffiliates said:
We are looking at using ai tools to re-write articles with ai and then running them through a huminazer, what are your experiences with this?, did you manage to rank your website with this type of content "that also passas Ai detection tools" ?

Any insights or input?

thanks

AI rewriting and humanizers work for quick traffic, but search engines eventually catch low-effort. adding real manual edits will keeps sites ranking.

app_pilot · Tuesday at 4:32 AM

AI rewriting and humanizers work for quick traffic, but search engines eventually catch low-effort. adding real manual edits will keeps sites ranking.

Starblazer · Tuesday at 5:18 AM

It's better to write with AI, then manually rewrite, and then check for grammar errors. No matter how many tools you run, they work on a pre-established pattern and leave footprints. Only content written by humans tends to be imperfect yet beautiful.

gs_seo · Tuesday at 5:27 AM

I’ve experimented with AI rewritten articles and humanizer tools and yes, some content passed AI detectors and performed reasonably well. But I noticed rankings depended more on originality, search intent, topical depth and overall quality. Humanizing alone wasn’t enough to consistently rank.

Sarah Mathews · Tuesday at 7:16 AM

mraffiliates said:
We are looking at using ai tools to re-write articles with ai and then running them through a huminazer, what are your experiences with this?, did you manage to rank your website with this type of content "that also passas Ai detection tools" ?

Any insights or input?

thanks

Humanized ai content can rank well if it meets the practical seo basics, strong search intent, useful and original information, proper on page optimization, good internal linking, and quality backlinks. Passing an ai detector alone wont guarantee rankings the content still needs to provide real value and compete well with the existing results.

NirvanaWolf · Tuesday at 7:30 AM

I don't understand the point of using a tool to rewrite content generated using another tool. Use AI and then manually edit and check the facts and/or numbers generated by AI.

PremiumAccountsHub · Tuesday at 10:20 AM

mraffiliates said:
We are looking at using ai tools to re-write articles with ai and then running them through a huminazer, what are your experiences with this?, did you manage to rank your website with this type of content "that also passas Ai detection tools" ?

Any insights or input?

thanks

AI content can rank, but I wouldn’t worry much about AI detectors. Good content, proper editing, and matching search intent matter more.

ViewCloak · Tuesday at 10:25 AM

Try using Claude or ChatGPT for the first draft, then use Grammarly to clean up the wording and flow.

Larry Scott · Tuesday at 10:28 AM

Honestly, relying on automated humanizers solely to bypass AI detectors is something of a trap at this point. Google does not penalize content merely for being AI generated, nor does it rely on third party AI detectors when ranking pages.

Experience with Ai content + Huminazers = good seo articles

Newbie

Elite Member

Newbie

Senior Member

Regular Member

Newbie

Newbie

Senior Member

Registered Member

Senior Member

Senior Member

Senior Member

Senior Member

Elite Member

Registered Member

Supreme Member

Elite Member

Regular Member

Newbie

Regular Member

Main Menu

Marketplace

Making Money

BlackHat World