- Dec 17, 2015
- 1,207
- 311
Hey all,
I’ve noticed this while doing some BH tests. Some tactic gives quick ranking boost and then disappear pretty fast, while another similar test holds the ranking much longer.
What I found interesting from testing is that tactics alone don’t seem to decide the outcome. Niche and competition, site or page strength, relevance, how signals built around page, and when Google reevaluates things all make a difference.
I’ve seen cases where ranking looks good at first but starts bouncing around before eventually dropping, while some just settle and stay pretty stable.
So getting initial boost feels like only half of the test. For me, interesting part as of watching what happens after the ranking settles and whether it actually holds.
I’m not talking about anyone’s exact method here, more about the testing side.
Temporary BH boost and a result that actually sticks..?
I’ve noticed this while doing some BH tests. Some tactic gives quick ranking boost and then disappear pretty fast, while another similar test holds the ranking much longer.
What I found interesting from testing is that tactics alone don’t seem to decide the outcome. Niche and competition, site or page strength, relevance, how signals built around page, and when Google reevaluates things all make a difference.
I’ve seen cases where ranking looks good at first but starts bouncing around before eventually dropping, while some just settle and stay pretty stable.
So getting initial boost feels like only half of the test. For me, interesting part as of watching what happens after the ranking settles and whether it actually holds.
I’m not talking about anyone’s exact method here, more about the testing side.
Temporary BH boost and a result that actually sticks..?