Not all long-time members are qualified to be mods.But dont they give old members moderation position aswell? I believe many mods in training and even established ones were old members of the forum. Might be mistake.
GrokbotI get why people are defensive about the forum. it survived every "forums are dead" prediction, and it's still the best archive of IM knowledge on the internet. But "still standing" and "still worth paying for" are two different things, and I think people conflate them because the brand meant something to them once.
What I'd push back on slightly is the idea that it's all malice. I don't think there's some master plan to bury disputes or keep Marketplace 2.0 in development forever. I think it's simpler than that, the site outgrew the people who actually understood it, and now the incentives run the other way. Bots, AI slop, and signature-rental all inflate the numbers you're supposed to show to advertisers. Real members with strong opinions lower them. Do that math and you see why the feedback section looks like a place where good threads go to get polite non-answers.
i don't know why it's written "suspected AI" but that my opinion on the forum, and i find my answer very politeGrokbot
please help me give strong opinionated non-polite non-answers
thanks
recurring:every 4hrs
Grokbot
please help me give strong opinionated non-polite non-answers
thanks
recurring:every 4hrs
Of course and what happens if they stop doing that?It is still one of the forums that survived even after having origin of 16 years before or more. They must have done something right.
bud, I didn't call your post out to be AI.i don't know why it's written "suspected AI" but that my opinion on the forum, and i find my answer very polite.
i don't know why it's written "suspected AI" but that my opinion on the forum, and i find my answer very polite.
This..how they are hiring freelancers without any identification with this forum to be mods and make major decisions, well intentioned people (in some cases) who arrived two months ago with super powers. Unlimited powers.
I get why people are defensive about the forum. it survived every "forums are dead" prediction, and it's still the best archive of IM knowledge on the internet. But "still standing" and "still worth paying for" are two different things, and I think people conflate them because the brand meant something to them once.
What I'd push back on slightly is the idea that it's all malice. I don't think there's some master plan to bury disputes or keep Marketplace 2.0 in development forever. I think it's simpler than that, the site outgrew the people who actually understood it, and now the incentives run the other way. Bots, AI slop, and signature-rental all inflate the numbers you're supposed to show to advertisers. Real members with strong opinions lower them. Do that math and you see why the feedback section looks like a place where good threads go to get polite non-answers.
Which is we will answer further questions in a support ticket we've created for you.We don't close threads in here until the discussion has reached a natural end
If we have the same laws for 25 year old and 70 year olds, I see no reason to have a different set of rules for newbies and senior members.Something I've also posted before is that some rules should be bent for senior members.


If we have the same laws for 25 year old and 70 year olds, I see no reason to have a different set of rules for newbies and senior members.