Nevertheless, YouTube is not saturated; only the bad content is. Packaging does help you get hits, but retaining them is what matters.People have been saying YouTube is saturated since 2015. Topics might be crowded, but quality, good pacing, and clickable packaging (title/thumbnail) will still outperform 95% of channels in any niche
Retaining is also a big challenge. The audience gets bored of a creator too soon. May be one should focus on extracting as much as popular during fame days.Nevertheless, YouTube is not saturated; only the bad content is. Packaging does help you get hits, but retaining them is what matters.
People are getting addicted to short-form videos of approximately 1 to 2 minutes. In this time, they want to gather as much information as they can. But if we speak about creators who teach something valuable on YouTube and people are willing to learn, then serious people would still be watching long-form videos. I have seen creators uploading 4 to 6 hours of videos as a course or teaching something and getting millions of views.I am seeing that all new creators are struggling with long form content. 1 out of thousands is able to gain some traction. Are we very near to completely saturated YouTube where it will be impossible to grow with long form content?
The problem is that you have no entry barriers for your content.I think while some niches are indeed extremely crowded, claiming that YouTube as a whole is saturated is a bit of an exaggeration. If you enter a major niche and simply replicate what hundreds of other channels are already doing, success will naturally be difficult. There is still room for growth, but average content faces a much tougher landscape than it did a few years ago. Channels need to innovate and improve the quality of their content and perspectives; simply repeating the same old formulas is unlikely to yield good results