thanks! what if all I care about for now is just the comment love?There’s no reliable way to automate engagement without risking penalties. Organic activity is much safer long term.
IMO, the proxies or older accounts does not really add any authenticity to the process, they just make the scheme more difficult to recognises. I would prefer to automate all the boring workflow stuff and let actual viewers create the engagement.It seems most of the "panels" that sell this stuff are just junk engagement that will get you penalized.
Let's say I set up my own proxies, anti-detect browsers, and aged YouTube accounts. Can I automate the engagement without getting penalized?
botting with the panel services isn't the problem, its how you bot it that makes the difference...people usually send 1000s of views and etc under like 5 mins and that super suspicious to any algo, you need to bot it in a natural pattern like making use of the drip feed feature, adding not just one metric, like not just views, but following it up with relative likes and shares and subscribers and etc.It seems most of the "panels" that sell this stuff are just junk engagement that will get you penalized.
Let's say I set up my own proxies, anti-detect browsers, and aged YouTube accounts. Can I automate the engagement without getting penalized?
True, actual engagement tends to be more valuable in the long run. Actual comments, likes, respnses and repeated visits provide indications that you can work with, rather than always wondering if your automation will be detected.I think the bigger issue is whether the engagement is genuine in the first place. Even if automation avoids detection, it seems risky to build a strategy around artificial engagement. Has anyone seen sustainable results from genuine engagement instead?