- Aug 28, 2026
- 431
- 133
I have build microsites targeting roofing in Australia and it was time saving and fast as compare to making every element by elementor
It definitely depends on the complexity. Are you trying to build out full stack websites with multiple sub pages and lot of content and heavy on graphics - then it will probably add up. I have not used it for anything massive yet, so I cannot really speak to how quickly the cost adds up on heavier projects. For what I use it for, which is mainly building and editing landing pages, it has been pretty affordable and does not burn through many credits. Starting with an existing landing page (usually a spied landing page from a competitor) and prompting specific changes definitely helps keep the usage down.interesting, ive been hearin alot of ppl mention manus lately but never actully tried it myself the fact it gives u hosting AND lets u export the code if u want is pretty clutch tbh, feels like it removes a lot of the usual friction
the workflow u described w/ spying a base LP then just prompting changes sounds super efficient too, way faster then buildin from scratch every time fr
question tho — how does it compare token/cost wise once u actully need to scale up or use it alot? like is it still cheap once ur past whatever free promo thing, or does it start addin up fast once u get into heavier projects? tryna figure out if its worth switchin over
That makes sense, thanks for breakin it down! for landing pages specifically, roughly how many credits does a typical edit run u? like if i wanted to swap out headlines, change a CTA button and tweak some images on an existing page, am i lookin at like 5-10 credits or is it way more then that?It definitely depends on the complexity. Are you trying to build out full stack websites with multiple sub pages and lot of content and heavy on graphics - then it will probably add up. I have not used it for anything massive yet, so I cannot really speak to how quickly the cost adds up on heavier projects. For what I use it for, which is mainly building and editing landing pages, it has been pretty affordable and does not burn through many credits. Starting with an existing landing page (usually a spied landing page from a competitor) and prompting specific changes definitely helps keep the usage down.