- Dec 17, 2015
- 1,216
- 321
Hey folks,
I came across a post on X (twitter) about a Gen Z employee, and it got me thinking about how workplace rules work sometimes.
Here's what it is....
She had a doctor's appointment one afternoon that couldn't be rescheduled, so she asked HR if she could work from home that day.
HR replied: "Unfortunately no, company policy doesn't allow WFH. Everyone is expected to be physically present in the office."
She said okay, understood. The next day she showed up, completed all her assigned tasks, and left only after finishing her work. No shortcuts, no complaints.
A few days later, HR called her in.
They said a big client had threatened to cancel their contract the previous night. They had called and texted her repeatedly, but she didn't answer.
She replied: Company policy doesn't allow WFH, so I assumed the policy applied to everyone.
Honestly, that reply got me thinking...
"When the company needs flexibility, it's teamwork and going the extra mile. But when an employee needs some flexibility, suddenly it's "company policy."
Of course, not every company or HR team like this. But I think point about consistency worth discussing.
I'm sharing it because I found the situation interesting, not in meant to hurt anyone.
Curious to hear your thoughts.
I came across a post on X (twitter) about a Gen Z employee, and it got me thinking about how workplace rules work sometimes.
Here's what it is....
She had a doctor's appointment one afternoon that couldn't be rescheduled, so she asked HR if she could work from home that day.
HR replied: "Unfortunately no, company policy doesn't allow WFH. Everyone is expected to be physically present in the office."
She said okay, understood. The next day she showed up, completed all her assigned tasks, and left only after finishing her work. No shortcuts, no complaints.
A few days later, HR called her in.
They said a big client had threatened to cancel their contract the previous night. They had called and texted her repeatedly, but she didn't answer.
She replied: Company policy doesn't allow WFH, so I assumed the policy applied to everyone.
Honestly, that reply got me thinking...
"When the company needs flexibility, it's teamwork and going the extra mile. But when an employee needs some flexibility, suddenly it's "company policy."
Of course, not every company or HR team like this. But I think point about consistency worth discussing.
I'm sharing it because I found the situation interesting, not in meant to hurt anyone.
Curious to hear your thoughts.