- Dec 17, 2015
- 1,181
- 291
Is tier 2 still passing authority to site, and are we looking at it in wrong way?
Nowadays we are focusing on citation-worthy, but traditional build of tier 2 links still strengthens the tier 1 links and pushes the value back through the link structure.
Yeah, I hear you guys; things are moving fast now, but does that mean the traditional way doesn't work anymore?
As for me, tier 2 makes more sense when pages are actually relevant to the tier 1 topic, indexed by google, and capable of attracting their own signals, instead of just using another layer to throw more links at tier 1.
So I'm thinking about tier 2 not only as authority-passing layer, but as citation-worthy support layer. What are your thoughts?
Nowadays we are focusing on citation-worthy, but traditional build of tier 2 links still strengthens the tier 1 links and pushes the value back through the link structure.
Yeah, I hear you guys; things are moving fast now, but does that mean the traditional way doesn't work anymore?
As for me, tier 2 makes more sense when pages are actually relevant to the tier 1 topic, indexed by google, and capable of attracting their own signals, instead of just using another layer to throw more links at tier 1.
So I'm thinking about tier 2 not only as authority-passing layer, but as citation-worthy support layer. What are your thoughts?