Have You Ever Removed a Backlink Because It Was Too Irrelevant?

Authority is useful, but relevance can make a link much more valuable.a smaller site in the same niche can be better than a big unrelated site.
 
I do not normally disavow a link simply because it’s irrelevant. First, I would consider the pattern of the links.single irrelevant links don’t cause many problems, but when there are lots of them, it can make the link profile seem unnatural.
 
The links that had no relation whatsoever to the topic have been removed from the document as well. I consider topical relevance and appropriateness of the link more important than the mere pursuit of high domain rating.
 
Absolutely. The factors that I consider while looking at backlinks include relevancy, quality, and context. Not one link which is irrelevant is going to be necessarily bad, but if there is a pattern of such links then one should look into it.
 
We usually talk about getting more backlinks, but I rarely see people discuss removing links that don’t really make sense for the site.

Have you ever looked at your backlink profile and decided that a link was doing more harm than good simply because it was completely unrelated?

Curious whether people here actually evaluate links based on relevance, or mainly look at authority and traffic.
Most people forgo removing irrelevant links, given that Google largely disregards them. Unless the links are outright spam, the effort is rarely justified.
 
Back
Top