What happens to parasite traffic after the ranking drops?

Sarah Mathews

Sarah Mathews

Senior Member
Jr. VIP
Joined
Sep 1, 2009
Messages
1,187
Reaction score
291
Hi, we usually focus on how quickly a parasite page can rank and how much traffic it can generate. But what happens to the traffic asset when that ranking eventually disappears?

If a parasite page gets 20K visitors for a few months and then drops out of Google, most of that traffic disappears with it.

So I'm wondering if the smarter approach is to use the initial visibility to build something that survives beyond the ranking itself , for example, building brand searches, returning visitors, email subscribers, or other forms of direct traffic.

This raises an interesting question:

Should we measure a parasite campaign by the traffic it generates while ranking, or by how much of that traffic can be converted into something that survives after the ranking is gone?

Do you treat parasite traffic as temporary traffic that you simply monetize, or do you try to turn that traffic into a longer term asset?
 
Advertise on BHW
It depends on your goal , but mostly the nature of parasites is come and go
 
IMO, parasite seo is always a short time method to get traffic untill needed. No one who wish long term ranking plan use parasite seo as it violates google term.
 
Parasitic SEO is a short term setup meant to bruteforce traffic to your site. Naturally, they have a very short shelf life because they are easy to flag. When rankings drop, you can go hunting for another parasite SEO or just normalize things
 
Sarah Mathews said:
Do you treat parasite traffic as temporary traffic that you simply monetize
Click to expand...

Yes and yes... That's all I see it being best used for, IMO.

Burn and churn, like it's with Reddit : )
 
Sarah Mathews said:
Hi, we usually focus on how quickly a parasite page can rank and how much traffic it can generate. But what happens to the traffic asset when that ranking eventually disappears?

If a parasite page gets 20K visitors for a few months and then drops out of Google, most of that traffic disappears with it.

So I'm wondering if the smarter approach is to use the initial visibility to build something that survives beyond the ranking itself , for example, building brand searches, returning visitors, email subscribers, or other forms of direct traffic.

This raises an interesting question:

Should we measure a parasite campaign by the traffic it generates while ranking, or by how much of that traffic can be converted into something that survives after the ranking is gone?

Do you treat parasite traffic as temporary traffic that you simply monetize, or do you try to turn that traffic into a longer term asset?
Click to expand...
Imo, real value is what we retain after the ranking disappears. I treat parasite traffic as an acquisition window to monetize it, but also to convert part of that traffic into brand searches, subscribers, or returning users. Otherwise, you’re just renting traffic from Google.
 
I think the long term value is in what you capture while the traffic is there since rankings can disappear without much warning
 
Sarah Mathews said:
Hi, we usually focus on how quickly a parasite page can rank and how much traffic it can generate. But what happens to the traffic asset when that ranking eventually disappears?

If a parasite page gets 20K visitors for a few months and then drops out of Google, most of that traffic disappears with it.

So I'm wondering if the smarter approach is to use the initial visibility to build something that survives beyond the ranking itself , for example, building brand searches, returning visitors, email subscribers, or other forms of direct traffic.

This raises an interesting question:

Should we measure a parasite campaign by the traffic it generates while ranking, or by how much of that traffic can be converted into something that survives after the ranking is gone?

Do you treat parasite traffic as temporary traffic that you simply monetize, or do you try to turn that traffic into a longer term asset?
Click to expand...
I’ll definitely measure it by what survives after the ranking disappears. The 20K visits are useful, but if you end up with zero brand searches, subscribers, customers, or returning visitors afterward, you essentially rented that traffic.
 
Monetizing the traffic is fine, but turning visitors into subscribers or returning customers makes the campaign much more valuable.
 
I would judge it by the goal of the campaign. If it is purely a quick cash play, monetize and move on. But if the traffic matches a real audience for your main business, I would definitely try to capture them while the page has visibility.
 
Sarah Mathews said:
So I'm wondering if the smarter approach is to use the initial visibility to build something that survives beyond the ranking itself , for example, building brand searches, returning visitors, email subscribers, or other forms of direct traffic.
Click to expand...
That has always been the way, which is why parasites are often used for CPA and product sale. It's never meant to be forever, it's basically pump and dump. Once a parasite stops working, you seek another.


That is the life cycle of parasite SEO.
 
Sarah Mathews said:
Hi, we usually focus on how quickly a parasite page can rank and how much traffic it can generate. But what happens to the traffic asset when that ranking eventually disappears?

If a parasite page gets 20K visitors for a few months and then drops out of Google, most of that traffic disappears with it.

So I'm wondering if the smarter approach is to use the initial visibility to build something that survives beyond the ranking itself , for example, building brand searches, returning visitors, email subscribers, or other forms of direct traffic.

This raises an interesting question:

Should we measure a parasite campaign by the traffic it generates while ranking, or by how much of that traffic can be converted into something that survives after the ranking is gone?

Do you treat parasite traffic as temporary traffic that you simply monetize, or do you try to turn that traffic into a longer term asset?
Click to expand...
it would be temporary traffic for me yet i would use it to construct something more permanent. if u manage to converrt some portion of that traffic into subscribers followers or even search for ur brand, then it will still be worth it.
 
I think the real value is what you retain after the ranking disappears. Temporary traffic can generate revenue, but turning some of those visitors into email subscribers, brand searches, or returning users creates a lasting asset. Parasite traffic should ideally be treated as a launchpad rather than the final destination.
 
I think parasite traffic usually drops a lot when the ranking goes down, but some traffic can still remain if the page ranks for other keywords.
 
True. Even after the main ranking drops, a page can still retain some traffic from long-tail and related keywords. Diversifying keyword rankings can help reduce the impact of losing one major position.
 
Sarah Mathews said:
Hi, we usually focus on how quickly a parasite page can rank and how much traffic it can generate. But what happens to the traffic asset when that ranking eventually disappears?

If a parasite page gets 20K visitors for a few months and then drops out of Google, most of that traffic disappears with it.

So I'm wondering if the smarter approach is to use the initial visibility to build something that survives beyond the ranking itself , for example, building brand searches, returning visitors, email subscribers, or other forms of direct traffic.

This raises an interesting question:

Should we measure a parasite campaign by the traffic it generates while ranking, or by how much of that traffic can be converted into something that survives after the ranking is gone?

Do you treat parasite traffic as temporary traffic that you simply monetize, or do you try to turn that traffic into a longer term asset?
Click to expand...
You should definitely measure a campaign by what survives after the ranking drops. Chasing quick affiliate clicks means you lose everything when the page falls.
 
i dont think someone looking for stable long term rankings would depend on it because parasite seo is more like a short term way to get some traffic when you need it. some methods can go against googles guidelines and the results may not last.
 
measure the long term value by what remains after the ranking fades brand awareness returning users subscribers or conversions Temporary traffic is useful but the lasting audience is what makes the effort more valuable.
 
Advertise on BHW
You must log in or register to reply here.
Sign up now!

Main Menu

Home Main Forum List Black Hat SEO White Hat SEO BHW Newbie Guide Blogging Black Hat Tools Social Media Downloads

Marketplace

Account Selling Content / Copywriting EBooks / Methods Hosting Misc Proxies For Sale SEO - Link building SEO - Packages Social Media Social Media - Panels Web Design More

Making Money

Affiliate Programs Hire a Freelancer IM Journeys Making Money Pay Per Click Site Flipping Want to Buy

BlackHat World

Dispute Resolution Forum Suggestions & Feedback Introductions Lounge
Back
Top