Trafficsaviour Vs trafficarmour vs cloakinghouse

darftwood said:
I would evaluate them based on your traffic source, support, and frequency of updates to their detection algorithms. In my opinion, even the cheap software can work well; however, stability is more important.
Click to expand...
Agreed. I would prioritize stability and suppoort rather than price. An inexpensive solution is acceptable if it meets your requirements consistently and the provider updates the detction algorithm regularly.
 
Advertise on BHW
All three can work fine, but it’s really up to you and your budget and the source of your traffic. I would also advise making sure that the safe page is relevant and corresponds to the ad/offer and isn’t just any old random page.
 
WealthpilotZ said:
I haven't tried cloaking house, but i used traffic armor before. it's a solid tool for sure, but the plan prices are just way too high if you are looking to scale. i actually switched to trafficguardian recently because its fit my budget and it's working good for my ads till now. but honestly, setup matters more than the tool itself. if your landing page is bad or you aren't using warm accounts, even the best cloaker won't save you.
Click to expand...
I agree that the setup is always more importnt than the tool, particlarly as you scale up. I would evaluate any setup based on the long-term stability of the accounts and quality of conversins, rather than performance in the first couple of days.
 
joebatham said:
hey guys, back after a month.
I’m working on some new campaigns and I’m stuck on picking a filter. been checking out trafficsaviour, traffic armor and cloaking house.
cloaking house is cheap but does it really work well or is just a waste of money? been getting mixed reviews all over. I just need something stable that won't expose my traffic.

which one should i go with?
Click to expand...
I feel that TrafficSaviour is a gud middle ground, TrafficArmor is quite costly but good quality nd CloakingHouse is inexpensive but needs to be tried out.
 
I wouldn’t choose based on who hides traffic best. Cloaking can still get campaigns or accounts killed sooner or later.

For long-term stability, fixing the offer/landing page to pass policy is a lot safer than depending on a filter.
 
willowsia said:
IMHO, do not depend solely upon the review . try all three with an equal amount of small traffic nd then look at your logs, false positives, uptime nd customer support.
Click to expand...
as far as I am concerned, I would conduct test on them before taking their claims into account since the difference between them will emerge over time.
 
adition said:
All three can work fine, but it’s really up to you and your budget and the source of your traffic. I would also advise making sure that the safe page is relevant and corresponds to the ad/offer and isn’t just any old random page.
Click to expand...
That’s right. The landing page should be part of the normal user experence and not just any other fill,in,the,blank landing page. Most of the time, what counts more is the relevance and congruency among the ad, pre-lander, and offer.
 
joebatham said:
hey guys, back after a month.
I’m working on some new campaigns and I’m stuck on picking a filter. been checking out trafficsaviour, traffic armor and cloaking house.
cloaking house is cheap but does it really work well or is just a waste of money? been getting mixed reviews all over. I just need something stable that won't expose my traffic.

which one should i go with?
Click to expand...
To be honest, I would never ever rely on the price tag when making any choices . Put the same amount of traffic through both and figure out which one is truly effective in keeping the garbage out.
 
The prices of the cloaking services you guys mentioned above are crazy, and the others still require coding.
 
adition said:
All three can work fine, but it’s really up to you and your budget and the source of your traffic. I would also advise making sure that the safe page is relevant and corresponds to the ad/offer and isn’t just any old random page.
Click to expand...
yes, you may think that the landing page is not important, but it really makes a huge difference. making sure that there is a good match between the landing page and the ad/offer increases the chances of conversion.
 
root.samth said:
cloaking house leaks a lot on fb cause their ip list is slow. traffic armor is fine but gets too expensive when scaling. trafficsaviour works fine for filtering bots and cost less. just run a small test first and check ur logs to see if it fits ur setup.
Click to expand...
Yes, testing first is definitely the way to go. Different configurations process traffic in different ways , and so testing the logs during a test run will be able to give you your answer fairly fast.
 
Advertise on BHW
You must log in or register to reply here.
Sign up now!

Main Menu

Home Main Forum List Black Hat SEO White Hat SEO BHW Newbie Guide Blogging Black Hat Tools Social Media Downloads

Marketplace

Account Selling Content / Copywriting EBooks / Methods Hosting Misc Proxies For Sale SEO - Link building SEO - Packages Social Media Social Media - Panels Web Design More

Making Money

Affiliate Programs Hire a Freelancer IM Journeys Making Money Pay Per Click Site Flipping Want to Buy

BlackHat World

Dispute Resolution Forum Suggestions & Feedback Introductions Lounge
Back
Top