What's the best way to rank on google?

Williams SEO said:

Hi all, I just want to know your thoughts about how to rank on google.

Recently I will create 2 to 4 websites and I post daily 2 to 3 article on all websites my all website rank on google and take 1k above impression and 20 to 30 click in 24 hours but now all is almost 0.

My all website are hit by google so tell me what I can do for rank again on google and how can I save from google hit?

Click to expand...

Focus less on publishing more articles and more on improving the content quality.

Start over with a bunch of aged domains

SEOForger said:

Focus less on publishing more articles and more on improving the content quality.

Click to expand...

I’d focus less on publishing more articles and put more effort into improving the quality of the content you already have. Stronger, more useful pages that genuinely satisfy search intent are usually a better investment than simply increasing publishing volume.

HustleTong said:

Start over with a bunch of aged domains

Click to expand...

Starting over with a bunch of aged domains wouldn’t be my first move. An aged domain can have value, but age alone doesn’t solve content, indexing, relevance, or authority problems.

That makes sense, especially when several sites drop around the same time. I'd also compare the timing of the decline with any major changes made to the sites, such as content updates, template changes or technical changes. Looking at the affected pages and queries before making more changes can help separate a site-wide issue from a normal ranking fluctuation. I think diagnosing the pattern first is better than rushing into a recovery strategy.

When I launch my blog, I tried using a fresh domain but everytime I passed the "honeymoon", after 7 days, my blog just drop and never came back... Then I tried use a aged domain and I've got pass the honeymoon and continue getting impressions and click.

Obviously my content was good, but using a aged domain to me was the deciding factor to "unblock" my blog.

I've only read the first page and hope someone hasn't already covered what I'm saying.

Anyway, to answer your question: if it's a fresh website, it should be in Google's grace period during the sandbox. Make sure to keep doing what you're doing for at least three months because Google keeps the website in the sandbox for at least 60 days. Meanwhile, create some Web 2.0 tools like buffer sites with high-quality content. You can use AI models for that.

Then create tiered link building. If you own tools like RankX, GSA, Search and Ranker, you can easily do this.

PS: Grab a Money Robot trial - you don't need to pay for it, just grab the trial for a buck - or Ranker X for a few days. Then create tier 1 using good models like Opus, and build tiered 2 backlinks to permanent. If you have time, create tier 1 manually. No matter how quality your tier 1 is, you still need tier 2 and tier 3 link wheels (tiered) to get indexed.

I would stop increasing the publishing volume for now and audit the existing pages first Check indexing search intent content quality and internal links to see what caused the traffic drop

RankVexa said:

That makes sense, especially when several sites drop around the same time. I'd also compare the timing of the decline with any major changes made to the sites, such as content updates, template changes or technical changes. Looking at the affected pages and queries before making more changes can help separate a site-wide issue from a normal ranking fluctuation. I think diagnosing the pattern first is better than rushing into a recovery strategy.

Click to expand...

Then I’d look at the specific pages and queries that lost visibility. If only certain sections were affected, that points toward a different problem than a sitewide decline.
I agree that diagnosing the pattern first is much better than immediately throwing more content or backlinks at the problem.

That said, I’d be careful about calling it a definite “honeymoon” or saying the aged domain was the only deciding factor. Aged domains can come with existing history, backlinks, topical relevance, and trust signals that a brand-new domain simply doesn't have.
If I were testing it, I’d compare the same content strategy across fresh and aged domains and track impressions, indexing, rankings, referring domains, and traffic over a longer period. That would make it easier to separate the domain-age effect from other factors.

Eduardo Saverin said:

focus less on publishing volume and more on content quality topical depth internal linking, and real authority signals If several sites dropped together check for indexing technical and algorithm related issues before increasing publishing frequency again.

Click to expand...

I’d focus less on publishing volume and more on content quality, topical depth, internal linking, and genuine authority signals. If several sites dropped at the same time, I’d first check for indexing, technical, and algorithm-related issues before increasing the publishing frequency again.

Nastrz said:

I've only read the first page and hope someone hasn't already covered what I'm saying.

Anyway, to answer your question: if it's a fresh website, it should be in Google's grace period during the sandbox. Make sure to keep doing what you're doing for at least three months because Google keeps the website in the sandbox for at least 60 days. Meanwhile, create some Web 2.0 tools like buffer sites with high-quality content. You can use AI models for that.

Then create tiered link building. If you own tools like RankX, GSA, Search and Ranker, you can easily do this.

PS: Grab a Money Robot trial - you don't need to pay for it, just grab the trial for a buck - or Ranker X for a few days. Then create tier 1 using good models like Opus, and build tiered 2 backlinks to permanent. If you have time, create tier 1 manually. No matter how quality your tier 1 is, you still need tier 2 and tier 3 link wheels (tiered) to get indexed.

Click to expand...

For a fresh site, I’d focus on building useful content, making sure the important pages are crawlable and indexed, and developing a natural internal-link structure. Supporting properties and tiered links can be tested, but I wouldn’t assume Tier 2/3 links are required just to get Tier 1 indexed.

Williams SEO said:

Then I’d look at the specific pages and queries that lost visibility. If only certain sections were affected, that points toward a different problem than a sitewide decline.
I agree that diagnosing the pattern first is much better than immediately throwing more content or backlinks at the problem.

Click to expand...

That's a good point. I'd also check whether the pages that lost visibility share the same content type or target similar search intent. If they do, the problem might be related to how Google is evaluating that particular topic rather than the whole site. That kind of comparison can make the next steps much clearer.

Williams SEO said:

For a fresh site, I’d focus on building useful content, making sure the important pages are crawlable and indexed, and developing a natural internal-link structure. Supporting properties and tiered links can be tested, but I wouldn’t assume Tier 2/3 links are required just to get Tier 1 indexed.

Click to expand...

Fair point man, tier 1 can index on its own sometimes, i wont argue that. but for me tiering was never only about indexing.. its about passing signals up through the tiers. indexing is just the side effect

and honestly ive tried everything over the years.. every tool, every service, niche edits here and there. nothing worked for me like tiered + automated link building with Ranker X, money robot, GSA SER. not even close. indexer credits got stupid expensive this year too, so a quick tier 2 under your web2.0s does the index job for free and passes juice while its at it

one more thing on "high quality content".. people say it like AI, native writer and spun all work the same or one of them is automaticaly the winner. not true. go check some niches, you still see doorway sites, cloaked sites, keyword stuffed pages sitting on page 1. ranking factors are almost random per niche. ive seen human written content fail where AI content ranked fine. its not who writes it, its where you target and what value you put in front of the reader

so for me its simple.. good AI content + automated tiered links. been the formula for years and still is

Williams SEO said:

Hi all, I just want to know your thoughts about how to rank on google.

Recently I will create 2 to 4 websites and I post daily 2 to 3 article on all websites my all website rank on google and take 1k above impression and 20 to 30 click in 24 hours but now all is almost 0.

My all website are hit by google so tell me what I can do for rank again on google and how can I save from google hit?

Click to expand...

If all 2–4 sites dropped at roughly the same time, I'd first look for a site-wide quality/content pattern, rather than immediately assuming a penalty. Publishing 2–3 articles daily across multiple new sites can become a problem if the content is repetitive, low-value, or mainly produced to capture rankings. Google specifically flags scaled content created primarily for search manipulation

I'd check GSC → Performance, Page Indexing, Manual Actions and Security, then compare which pages/queries actually lost visibility