Any good AI can help with the first draft, but ranking depends more on the quality of the final content than the tool itself. Human editing and original value still matter the most
3.5 is still meta? why not 5? do you have any specific prompts/skills that you use? ever considered using an orchestrator through claude code to have sonnet subagents generate the sections in parallel? any recs in general?Everyone says it is all about the editing which is true to an extent, but some models are definitely easier to work with. Claude 3.5 sonnet is way ahead of gpt-4o for actual readability and flow. If you just use standard prompts though it still looks like ai. You need to build a solid outline first and generate it section by section instead of asking for a 3000 word article in one go... that always ends up being 90% fluff.
honestly, i focus onthe content itselfmore than the tool. Good research and editing usually matter more.Since every writer is now using AI to generate content, which AI can produce long, quality content that can rank on Google?
lmao did you write this with claude, respect the consistencyYou should try Claude AI, developed by Anthropic. Claude can efficiently read, summarize, and analyze long documents, making it ideal for research and editing tasks, but it's free with limited uses. You could invest in this program to better serve your work.