Do auto NSFW AI galleries work?

Ruriko

Power Member
Joined
May 4, 2008
Messages
717
Reaction score
26
Has anyone been successful in generating money by creating an automated nsfw AI images and auto post to their blog/site. I wonder if you can even generate traffic from search engines
 
You can generate traffic, but you need to bypass AI Image detection at first place, what is the hardest part. Only private tools can bypass that detections for now.
 
You can generate traffic, but you need to bypass AI Image detection at first place, what is the hardest part. Only private tools can bypass that detections for now.

I thought these detectors mostly catch images from services like chatgpt or gemini or grok because of hiden watermarks. But can they also detect images made locally with stable diffusion or similar software?
 
yeah it can work but getting traffic from search engines is not easy because of strict rules and high competition because the main challenge is usually getting visitors and finding a good way to make better money.
 
I thought these detectors mostly catch images from services like chatgpt or gemini or grok because of hiden watermarks. But can they also detect images made locally with stable diffusion or similar software?
Yes, they can. No matter where you generate, there is AI pixel signature and this signature are easy detectable. So they can detect any AI generated images.
 
Yes, they can. No matter where you generate, there is AI pixel signature and this signature are easy detectable. So they can detect any AI generated images.
What if you edit the images first, add filters, or use software that slightly changes the pixels? Does it work?
 
it depends on how you promote them. But the quality really has to be very good because if it is bad quality people won't be interested
 
Yes, they can. No matter where you generate, there is AI pixel signature and this signature are easy detectable. So they can detect any AI generated images.
how do you see the AI pixel signature?
 
What if you edit the images first, add filters, or use software that slightly changes the pixels? Does it work?
Nah, that wont work, this worked maybe before AI, not anymore. Rotation, adding grain dont work anymore.

how do you see the AI pixel signature?
AI image detectors are trained on specific pixel signature so they can easily detect AI generated images, because AI images lack of micro sensor noise, aberation etc...its easy to detect this images, dont even need big training database.
 
Last edited:
Do 3rd party services like CivitAI have hidden signature? or does anyone know any cheap ai services with lots of image generations that doesn't add hidden ai signature?
 
you guys are worrying way too much about AI image detection. google and other search engines do not spend massive computing power running deep detectors on every single image they crawl, especially in the nsfw niche. if you run stable diffusion locally there is no hardcoded watermark tracking you down... it is mostly just metadata which you can strip in bulk easily. the real bottleneck for automated nsfw sites is indexing and safe search. if you just spam thousands of images with zero context or text, search engines will just treat the domain as spam. focus on good tagging, clean metadata, and unique titles instead of worrying about pixel signatures.
 
you guys are worrying way too much about AI image detection. google and other search engines do not spend massive computing power running deep detectors on every single image they crawl, especially in the nsfw niche. if you run stable diffusion locally there is no hardcoded watermark tracking you down... it is mostly just metadata which you can strip in bulk easily. the real bottleneck for automated nsfw sites is indexing and safe search. if you just spam thousands of images with zero context or text, search engines will just treat the domain as spam. focus on good tagging, clean metadata, and unique titles instead of worrying about pixel signatures.
Thats not true at all. We tested AI images vs. AI Humanized images and humanized rank around 93% better than AI images. Same images, only difference was one was not detected as AI, or had low score, like under 10 on AI detection pages. Fot Google is easy to detect AI images even if they are made with StableDiffusion models, Flux or any other OpenSource generators. And Gemini is vision model and can easy detect AI images. Not for indexing, but for ranking 100%! But to strip off AI fingerprint is really hard and also expensive.
 
Back
Top