AI used for guest post content?

Wondering if anyone has any experience on using AI to generate content for backlinks, particularly guest posts. Any issues with doing this? Assuming the content is human reviewed, accurate and aligned with the topic any issues with the links passing less value or generally is the consensus still that AI content is fine as long as it is useful?
AI itself is not the problem imo, it is more about the quality and how unique the guest post actually is. If it is just spun AI text with a backlink slapped in chances are it will not do much.
 
I think AI content is fine if you edit it properly and make it useful. The main thing is the quality of the article, not just how it was created.
 
I've been wondering about this as well from what I've seen overall quality and relevance seem more important than how the content is created especially if it is properly reviewed and provides value
 
AI is fine, as long as what it says is useful and mostly accurate too, and it gets properly edited. Google cares way more about the quality of the output than about whether an AI wrote it. The site authority and how relevant it is matter far more than the content creation method or process itself.
 
AI was used to draft and come up with ideas, but I would not publish AI-generated content as a guest post. Refinement and incorporation of my own experiences tend to make the article much better.
 
I think AI is fine for making the first draft. Just do not copy and publish it. Read it, fix the mistakes and make it sound natural.
 
In my opinion, the backlink value depends more on the website quality and relevance. The content should match the audience and not look like a simple AI copy.
 
use ai for first drafts on guest posts regularly, never had a publisher reject or a link get devalued specifically bcuz of it, wat actually kills placements is when its obviously unedited n generic sounding, publishers can smell that instantly n either reject or bury it w no real placement value. my process is ai draft then heavy human edit for specific examples/data/actual opinion, basically make it sound like someone who actually knows the topic wrote it not just structured info. link value wise havent seen any diff in how these perform vs fully human written ones, google cares more if the page ranks n gets real traffic than how it was originally drafted
Yes, that's exactly what I do.
 
95% of what you see on the internet today is AI-generated anyway, so it's just a tool - using it isn't a bad thing in itself. It all comes down to quality.
 
Back
Top